Worms under cover: relationships between performance in learning tasks and personality in great tits (Parus major)

M. Amy, K. van Oers, M. Naguib

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In animals, individual differences in learning ability are common and are in part explained by genetic differences, developmental conditions and by general experience. Yet, not all variations in learning are well understood. Individual differences in learning may be associated with elementary individual characteristics that are consistent across situations and over time, commonly referred to as personality or temperament. Here, we tested whether or not male great tits (Parus major) from two selection lines for fast or slow exploratory behaviour, an operational measure for avian personality, vary in their learning performance in two related consecutive tasks. In the first task, birds had to associate a colour with a reward whereas in the second task, they had to associate a new colour with a reward ignoring the previously rewarded colour. Slow explorers had shorter latencies to approach the experimental device compared with fast explorers in both tasks, but birds from the two selection lines did not differ in accomplishing the first task, that is, to associate a colour with a reward. However, in the second task, fast explorers had longer latencies to solve the trials than slow explorers. Moreover, relative to the number of trials needed to reach the learning criteria in the first task, birds from the slow selection line took more trials to associate a new colour with a reward while ignoring the previously learned association compared with birds from the fast selection line. Overall, the experiments suggest that personality in great tits is not strongly related to learning per se in such an association task, but that birds from different selection lines might express different learning strategies as birds from the different selection lines were differently affected by their previous learning performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)763-770
JournalAnimal Cognition
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Parus major
Personality
learning
Learning
Birds
bird
Reward
Color
birds
color
Individuality
temperament
Exploratory Behavior
Aptitude
Temperament
Equipment and Supplies
animal

Keywords

  • risk-taking behavior
  • avian personalities
  • individual-differences
  • realized heritability
  • social information
  • evolution
  • cognition
  • traits
  • stress
  • prey

Cite this

@article{80bcdcd8a4fb4b2aab2d852923d8e0fd,
title = "Worms under cover: relationships between performance in learning tasks and personality in great tits (Parus major)",
abstract = "In animals, individual differences in learning ability are common and are in part explained by genetic differences, developmental conditions and by general experience. Yet, not all variations in learning are well understood. Individual differences in learning may be associated with elementary individual characteristics that are consistent across situations and over time, commonly referred to as personality or temperament. Here, we tested whether or not male great tits (Parus major) from two selection lines for fast or slow exploratory behaviour, an operational measure for avian personality, vary in their learning performance in two related consecutive tasks. In the first task, birds had to associate a colour with a reward whereas in the second task, they had to associate a new colour with a reward ignoring the previously rewarded colour. Slow explorers had shorter latencies to approach the experimental device compared with fast explorers in both tasks, but birds from the two selection lines did not differ in accomplishing the first task, that is, to associate a colour with a reward. However, in the second task, fast explorers had longer latencies to solve the trials than slow explorers. Moreover, relative to the number of trials needed to reach the learning criteria in the first task, birds from the slow selection line took more trials to associate a new colour with a reward while ignoring the previously learned association compared with birds from the fast selection line. Overall, the experiments suggest that personality in great tits is not strongly related to learning per se in such an association task, but that birds from different selection lines might express different learning strategies as birds from the different selection lines were differently affected by their previous learning performance.",
keywords = "risk-taking behavior, avian personalities, individual-differences, realized heritability, social information, evolution, cognition, traits, stress, prey",
author = "M. Amy and {van Oers}, K. and M. Naguib",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/s10071-012-0500-3",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "763--770",
journal = "Animal Cognition",
issn = "1435-9448",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

Worms under cover: relationships between performance in learning tasks and personality in great tits (Parus major). / Amy, M.; van Oers, K.; Naguib, M.

In: Animal Cognition, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2012, p. 763-770.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Worms under cover: relationships between performance in learning tasks and personality in great tits (Parus major)

AU - Amy, M.

AU - van Oers, K.

AU - Naguib, M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In animals, individual differences in learning ability are common and are in part explained by genetic differences, developmental conditions and by general experience. Yet, not all variations in learning are well understood. Individual differences in learning may be associated with elementary individual characteristics that are consistent across situations and over time, commonly referred to as personality or temperament. Here, we tested whether or not male great tits (Parus major) from two selection lines for fast or slow exploratory behaviour, an operational measure for avian personality, vary in their learning performance in two related consecutive tasks. In the first task, birds had to associate a colour with a reward whereas in the second task, they had to associate a new colour with a reward ignoring the previously rewarded colour. Slow explorers had shorter latencies to approach the experimental device compared with fast explorers in both tasks, but birds from the two selection lines did not differ in accomplishing the first task, that is, to associate a colour with a reward. However, in the second task, fast explorers had longer latencies to solve the trials than slow explorers. Moreover, relative to the number of trials needed to reach the learning criteria in the first task, birds from the slow selection line took more trials to associate a new colour with a reward while ignoring the previously learned association compared with birds from the fast selection line. Overall, the experiments suggest that personality in great tits is not strongly related to learning per se in such an association task, but that birds from different selection lines might express different learning strategies as birds from the different selection lines were differently affected by their previous learning performance.

AB - In animals, individual differences in learning ability are common and are in part explained by genetic differences, developmental conditions and by general experience. Yet, not all variations in learning are well understood. Individual differences in learning may be associated with elementary individual characteristics that are consistent across situations and over time, commonly referred to as personality or temperament. Here, we tested whether or not male great tits (Parus major) from two selection lines for fast or slow exploratory behaviour, an operational measure for avian personality, vary in their learning performance in two related consecutive tasks. In the first task, birds had to associate a colour with a reward whereas in the second task, they had to associate a new colour with a reward ignoring the previously rewarded colour. Slow explorers had shorter latencies to approach the experimental device compared with fast explorers in both tasks, but birds from the two selection lines did not differ in accomplishing the first task, that is, to associate a colour with a reward. However, in the second task, fast explorers had longer latencies to solve the trials than slow explorers. Moreover, relative to the number of trials needed to reach the learning criteria in the first task, birds from the slow selection line took more trials to associate a new colour with a reward while ignoring the previously learned association compared with birds from the fast selection line. Overall, the experiments suggest that personality in great tits is not strongly related to learning per se in such an association task, but that birds from different selection lines might express different learning strategies as birds from the different selection lines were differently affected by their previous learning performance.

KW - risk-taking behavior

KW - avian personalities

KW - individual-differences

KW - realized heritability

KW - social information

KW - evolution

KW - cognition

KW - traits

KW - stress

KW - prey

U2 - 10.1007/s10071-012-0500-3

DO - 10.1007/s10071-012-0500-3

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 763

EP - 770

JO - Animal Cognition

JF - Animal Cognition

SN - 1435-9448

IS - 5

ER -