Abstract
We study the environmental and economic consequences of introducing a program to compensate peasants for damages caused by wildlife. We show that the widely held belief that compensation induces wildlife conservation may be erroneous. In a partially open economy, compensation can lower the wildlife stock and result in a net welfare loss for local people. In an open economy, compensation can trigger wildlife extinction and also reduce welfare. We identify the conditions leading to a reduction of the wildlife stock and discuss the implications for current and planned compensation programs in Africa and Asia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 490-507 |
| Journal | American Journal of Agricultural Economics |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Keywords
- development-projects icdps
- property-rights
- integrated conservation
- habitat conservation
- economics
- protection
- ecosystem
- payments
- reserve
- impact
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Wildlife Damage and Agriculture: A Dynamic Analysis of Compensation Schemes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver