Why the complex nature of integrated ecosystem assessments requires a flexible and adaptive approach

M. Dickey-Collas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)


This article considers the approach taken by the ICES to integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs) in the context of the wider evolution of IEAs and the science/policy landscape within the ICES region. It looks forward and considers the challenges facing the development of IEAs, specifically those of scoping for objectives, participatory engagement, developing indicators and targets, risk analysis, and creating tools to evaluate management measures for marine anthropogenic activities. It concludes that expectations that the implementation of IEAs will take an ordered, stepwise approach will lead to disappointment and frustration. This is a consequence of the need to operate in an adaptive manner in a complex system. The ecosystem, the science support infrastructure, and the governance systems are all complex. Plus when engaged in a debate about societal objectives, we expect to encounter a complex and changing landscape. As a community, the challenge is to find leverage mechanisms to encourage IEA efforts to provide insights and tools within resources. We will need to innovate and be responsive to the complexity of the ecosystem and governance structures encountered when performing IEA.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1174-1182
JournalICES Journal of Marine Science
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2014


  • fisheries management
  • ecological indicators
  • mixed-fisheries
  • framework
  • implementation
  • policy
  • uncertainty
  • thresholds
  • scientists
  • support

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Why the complex nature of integrated ecosystem assessments requires a flexible and adaptive approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this