Why not investing in sensors is logical for dairy farmers

W. Steeneveld*, C.J. Rutten, A.G.J.M. Oude Lansink, H. Hogeveen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paperAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

There are many claims regarding the potential of sensors for dairy farming, but in general the adoption on farms is still low. For sensor manufacturers, it is important to realize that uncertainty about future technological progress may influence the adoption of sensors. The aim of the current study was to explain why dairy farmers do not (yet) adopt sensors on their farms. To explain this, the uncertainty of the investment decision for highly adopted sensors (automated estrus detection) and recently released and thus hardly adopted sensors (automated body condition scoring (BCS)) was illustrated. The illustration makes use of the real options theory to analyze the timing of investment decisions. The results indicated that investing now in automated estrus detection resulted in higher economic returns than investing 5 years from now, while for the automated BCS postponing the investment resulted in higher economic returns compared to investing now. These results show that farmers indicating that they did not (yet) invest in sensors because they are waiting for improved versions made rational decisions. Based on the illustration it is economically worthwhile to postpone investments in sensors for which there is much uncertainty. Also, the current high adoption of automated estrus detection sensors is logical because the net present value of investing now is higher than the net present value of investing in 5 years. This study illustrated that uncertainty about the benefits of a sensor system, potential future improvement of sensor technology, and expected better management information from a sensor system, form rational economic reasons to postpone investment in sensor systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages55-65
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event8th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, 2017 - Nantes, France
Duration: 12 Sep 201714 Sep 2017

Conference

Conference8th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, 2017
CountryFrance
CityNantes
Period12/09/1714/09/17

Fingerprint

sensors (equipment)
dairies
farmers
estrus detection
uncertainty
body condition
farms
information management
dairy farming
economics

Keywords

  • Adoption
  • Dairy
  • Economics
  • Investment
  • Sensors

Cite this

Steeneveld, W., Rutten, C. J., Oude Lansink, A. G. J. M., & Hogeveen, H. (2017). Why not investing in sensors is logical for dairy farmers. 55-65. Paper presented at 8th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, 2017, Nantes, France.
Steeneveld, W. ; Rutten, C.J. ; Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M. ; Hogeveen, H. / Why not investing in sensors is logical for dairy farmers. Paper presented at 8th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, 2017, Nantes, France.11 p.
@conference{93b9d65326854005be29e7958a556e97,
title = "Why not investing in sensors is logical for dairy farmers",
abstract = "There are many claims regarding the potential of sensors for dairy farming, but in general the adoption on farms is still low. For sensor manufacturers, it is important to realize that uncertainty about future technological progress may influence the adoption of sensors. The aim of the current study was to explain why dairy farmers do not (yet) adopt sensors on their farms. To explain this, the uncertainty of the investment decision for highly adopted sensors (automated estrus detection) and recently released and thus hardly adopted sensors (automated body condition scoring (BCS)) was illustrated. The illustration makes use of the real options theory to analyze the timing of investment decisions. The results indicated that investing now in automated estrus detection resulted in higher economic returns than investing 5 years from now, while for the automated BCS postponing the investment resulted in higher economic returns compared to investing now. These results show that farmers indicating that they did not (yet) invest in sensors because they are waiting for improved versions made rational decisions. Based on the illustration it is economically worthwhile to postpone investments in sensors for which there is much uncertainty. Also, the current high adoption of automated estrus detection sensors is logical because the net present value of investing now is higher than the net present value of investing in 5 years. This study illustrated that uncertainty about the benefits of a sensor system, potential future improvement of sensor technology, and expected better management information from a sensor system, form rational economic reasons to postpone investment in sensor systems.",
keywords = "Adoption, Dairy, Economics, Investment, Sensors",
author = "W. Steeneveld and C.J. Rutten and {Oude Lansink}, A.G.J.M. and H. Hogeveen",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
pages = "55--65",
note = "8th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, 2017 ; Conference date: 12-09-2017 Through 14-09-2017",

}

Steeneveld, W, Rutten, CJ, Oude Lansink, AGJM & Hogeveen, H 2017, 'Why not investing in sensors is logical for dairy farmers' Paper presented at 8th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, 2017, Nantes, France, 12/09/17 - 14/09/17, pp. 55-65.

Why not investing in sensors is logical for dairy farmers. / Steeneveld, W.; Rutten, C.J.; Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M.; Hogeveen, H.

2017. 55-65 Paper presented at 8th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, 2017, Nantes, France.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paperAcademicpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Why not investing in sensors is logical for dairy farmers

AU - Steeneveld, W.

AU - Rutten, C.J.

AU - Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M.

AU - Hogeveen, H.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - There are many claims regarding the potential of sensors for dairy farming, but in general the adoption on farms is still low. For sensor manufacturers, it is important to realize that uncertainty about future technological progress may influence the adoption of sensors. The aim of the current study was to explain why dairy farmers do not (yet) adopt sensors on their farms. To explain this, the uncertainty of the investment decision for highly adopted sensors (automated estrus detection) and recently released and thus hardly adopted sensors (automated body condition scoring (BCS)) was illustrated. The illustration makes use of the real options theory to analyze the timing of investment decisions. The results indicated that investing now in automated estrus detection resulted in higher economic returns than investing 5 years from now, while for the automated BCS postponing the investment resulted in higher economic returns compared to investing now. These results show that farmers indicating that they did not (yet) invest in sensors because they are waiting for improved versions made rational decisions. Based on the illustration it is economically worthwhile to postpone investments in sensors for which there is much uncertainty. Also, the current high adoption of automated estrus detection sensors is logical because the net present value of investing now is higher than the net present value of investing in 5 years. This study illustrated that uncertainty about the benefits of a sensor system, potential future improvement of sensor technology, and expected better management information from a sensor system, form rational economic reasons to postpone investment in sensor systems.

AB - There are many claims regarding the potential of sensors for dairy farming, but in general the adoption on farms is still low. For sensor manufacturers, it is important to realize that uncertainty about future technological progress may influence the adoption of sensors. The aim of the current study was to explain why dairy farmers do not (yet) adopt sensors on their farms. To explain this, the uncertainty of the investment decision for highly adopted sensors (automated estrus detection) and recently released and thus hardly adopted sensors (automated body condition scoring (BCS)) was illustrated. The illustration makes use of the real options theory to analyze the timing of investment decisions. The results indicated that investing now in automated estrus detection resulted in higher economic returns than investing 5 years from now, while for the automated BCS postponing the investment resulted in higher economic returns compared to investing now. These results show that farmers indicating that they did not (yet) invest in sensors because they are waiting for improved versions made rational decisions. Based on the illustration it is economically worthwhile to postpone investments in sensors for which there is much uncertainty. Also, the current high adoption of automated estrus detection sensors is logical because the net present value of investing now is higher than the net present value of investing in 5 years. This study illustrated that uncertainty about the benefits of a sensor system, potential future improvement of sensor technology, and expected better management information from a sensor system, form rational economic reasons to postpone investment in sensor systems.

KW - Adoption

KW - Dairy

KW - Economics

KW - Investment

KW - Sensors

M3 - Conference paper

SP - 55

EP - 65

ER -

Steeneveld W, Rutten CJ, Oude Lansink AGJM, Hogeveen H. Why not investing in sensors is logical for dairy farmers. 2017. Paper presented at 8th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, 2017, Nantes, France.