Why do unusual novel foods like insects lack sensory appeal? Investigating the underlying sensory perceptions

Grace Tan Hui Shan, Claudia Joyce Tibboel, Markus Stieger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Unusual novel foods like insects generally hold little sensory appeal for consumers, but little is known about the underlying sensory perceptions and how the properties of the food contribute to acceptance. This study examined the sensory perceptions of 3 unusual novel foods (lamb brain, frog meat, mealworms) that were claimed to be present in beef burger patties. Dutch consumers (n = 100) performed descriptive sensory evaluations and assessed food appropriateness of four different burger patties before and after tasting, and reported their willingness to eat again. The 4 samples were presented in different combinations with 4 labels claiming either 100% beef or 75% beef and 25% novel ingredient, to explore how the food's identity and properties contribute to sensory perceptions. Beliefs about the food's taste were informed by species-related associations, and tended to be more negative when the food had never been tasted before. While these pre-consumption beliefs had some influence on sensory perceptions after tasting, the food's properties mainly determined the consumption experience. However, the low willingness to eat had more to do with food appropriateness than the actual taste of the food. The food's taste nevertheless exerts an influence on the perceived food appropriateness and should not be neglected. While incorporating unusual novel foods within a familiar product could help to create more positive expectations, it is still less appealing than the original products that consumers are familiar with. We recommend that future research on novel food acceptance should take into account that perceptions differ between novel and familiar foods, and that product development for culturally inappropriate foods requires selecting suitable product types and adjustment of its properties to match both consumer motivations and taste expectations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-58
JournalFood Quality and Preference
Volume60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

novel foods
Insects
Food
insects
beef
patties
food quality
food beliefs
product development
sensory evaluation
frogs
lambs
ingredients
meat
brain
Tenebrio
Social Adjustment
sampling

Keywords

  • Edible insects
  • Familiarity
  • Food appropriateness
  • Novel food
  • Sensory perception

Cite this

@article{b90f0f56625245a99b249c7a718ff5df,
title = "Why do unusual novel foods like insects lack sensory appeal? Investigating the underlying sensory perceptions",
abstract = "Unusual novel foods like insects generally hold little sensory appeal for consumers, but little is known about the underlying sensory perceptions and how the properties of the food contribute to acceptance. This study examined the sensory perceptions of 3 unusual novel foods (lamb brain, frog meat, mealworms) that were claimed to be present in beef burger patties. Dutch consumers (n = 100) performed descriptive sensory evaluations and assessed food appropriateness of four different burger patties before and after tasting, and reported their willingness to eat again. The 4 samples were presented in different combinations with 4 labels claiming either 100{\%} beef or 75{\%} beef and 25{\%} novel ingredient, to explore how the food's identity and properties contribute to sensory perceptions. Beliefs about the food's taste were informed by species-related associations, and tended to be more negative when the food had never been tasted before. While these pre-consumption beliefs had some influence on sensory perceptions after tasting, the food's properties mainly determined the consumption experience. However, the low willingness to eat had more to do with food appropriateness than the actual taste of the food. The food's taste nevertheless exerts an influence on the perceived food appropriateness and should not be neglected. While incorporating unusual novel foods within a familiar product could help to create more positive expectations, it is still less appealing than the original products that consumers are familiar with. We recommend that future research on novel food acceptance should take into account that perceptions differ between novel and familiar foods, and that product development for culturally inappropriate foods requires selecting suitable product types and adjustment of its properties to match both consumer motivations and taste expectations.",
keywords = "Edible insects, Familiarity, Food appropriateness, Novel food, Sensory perception",
author = "{Tan Hui Shan}, Grace and Tibboel, {Claudia Joyce} and Markus Stieger",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.03.012",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "48--58",
journal = "Food Quality and Preference",
issn = "0950-3293",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Why do unusual novel foods like insects lack sensory appeal? Investigating the underlying sensory perceptions. / Tan Hui Shan, Grace; Tibboel, Claudia Joyce; Stieger, Markus.

In: Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 60, 2017, p. 48-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do unusual novel foods like insects lack sensory appeal? Investigating the underlying sensory perceptions

AU - Tan Hui Shan, Grace

AU - Tibboel, Claudia Joyce

AU - Stieger, Markus

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Unusual novel foods like insects generally hold little sensory appeal for consumers, but little is known about the underlying sensory perceptions and how the properties of the food contribute to acceptance. This study examined the sensory perceptions of 3 unusual novel foods (lamb brain, frog meat, mealworms) that were claimed to be present in beef burger patties. Dutch consumers (n = 100) performed descriptive sensory evaluations and assessed food appropriateness of four different burger patties before and after tasting, and reported their willingness to eat again. The 4 samples were presented in different combinations with 4 labels claiming either 100% beef or 75% beef and 25% novel ingredient, to explore how the food's identity and properties contribute to sensory perceptions. Beliefs about the food's taste were informed by species-related associations, and tended to be more negative when the food had never been tasted before. While these pre-consumption beliefs had some influence on sensory perceptions after tasting, the food's properties mainly determined the consumption experience. However, the low willingness to eat had more to do with food appropriateness than the actual taste of the food. The food's taste nevertheless exerts an influence on the perceived food appropriateness and should not be neglected. While incorporating unusual novel foods within a familiar product could help to create more positive expectations, it is still less appealing than the original products that consumers are familiar with. We recommend that future research on novel food acceptance should take into account that perceptions differ between novel and familiar foods, and that product development for culturally inappropriate foods requires selecting suitable product types and adjustment of its properties to match both consumer motivations and taste expectations.

AB - Unusual novel foods like insects generally hold little sensory appeal for consumers, but little is known about the underlying sensory perceptions and how the properties of the food contribute to acceptance. This study examined the sensory perceptions of 3 unusual novel foods (lamb brain, frog meat, mealworms) that were claimed to be present in beef burger patties. Dutch consumers (n = 100) performed descriptive sensory evaluations and assessed food appropriateness of four different burger patties before and after tasting, and reported their willingness to eat again. The 4 samples were presented in different combinations with 4 labels claiming either 100% beef or 75% beef and 25% novel ingredient, to explore how the food's identity and properties contribute to sensory perceptions. Beliefs about the food's taste were informed by species-related associations, and tended to be more negative when the food had never been tasted before. While these pre-consumption beliefs had some influence on sensory perceptions after tasting, the food's properties mainly determined the consumption experience. However, the low willingness to eat had more to do with food appropriateness than the actual taste of the food. The food's taste nevertheless exerts an influence on the perceived food appropriateness and should not be neglected. While incorporating unusual novel foods within a familiar product could help to create more positive expectations, it is still less appealing than the original products that consumers are familiar with. We recommend that future research on novel food acceptance should take into account that perceptions differ between novel and familiar foods, and that product development for culturally inappropriate foods requires selecting suitable product types and adjustment of its properties to match both consumer motivations and taste expectations.

KW - Edible insects

KW - Familiarity

KW - Food appropriateness

KW - Novel food

KW - Sensory perception

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.03.012

DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.03.012

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 48

EP - 58

JO - Food Quality and Preference

JF - Food Quality and Preference

SN - 0950-3293

ER -