Abstract
Despite increased attention to climate finance in urban adaptation, empirical data on the socio-political processes shaping funding accessibility, allocation, and their implications for inter-urban adaptation progress remains limited. In a first-of-its-kind survey, we analyse results from 148 urban administrations across 17 EU countries. Our results reveal widespread funding shortages (>85% of administrations), insufficient staff capacity (73%) and low levels of political support (43%). Additionally, we find limited participation of vulnerable groups and inadequate consideration of climate risks and vulnerability when allocating resources. Towns lag behind cities, and Southern Europe lags behind Northern Europe in funding adaptation measures. Notably, higher climate risk levels are not associated with easier access to funding sources or increased funding availability. With reliance on public funding over loans, we nuance the role of financialisation in urban climate governance and propose cohesive adaptation as a finance strategy towards more equitable policy and practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 074061 |
| Journal | Environmental Research Letters |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- adaptation finance
- adaptation progress
- inter-urban equity
- municipal finance
- urban climate adaptation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Who leads, who lags? Inter-urban inequities in European climate adaptation funding and financing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver