Where management practices and experiential practices meet: public support and conflict in ecosystem management

A.E. Buijs, B.H.M. Elands, R.B.M. van Marwijk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In recent years, ecosystem management and recreation have become closely intertwined. Ecosystem management (ESM) influences recreational opportunities and the attractiveness of natural areas, so nowadays local communities are often invited to participate in decision-making about it. And in some cases, local communities object to ecosystem management measures. We will argue that analysing these phenomena as practices can reveal how they mutually influence each other. We will show that recreational practices (which we propose to call experiential practices) are based on the attribution of positive meanings to nature. We also show that if such practices are threatened by new or changing ecosystem management measures, social protest may emerge. We also argue that both recreational behaviour and the appreciation of nature are highly routinised. However, the implementation of contested ESM measures may disrupt such routines and trigger local communities to protest against these measures and, under certain conditions, the protest can even influence management policy. We end the chapter with a short reflection on the role of qualitative and quantitative methodologies in a practice based approach.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationForest and nature governance: a practice based approach
EditorsB.J.M. Arts, J.M. Behagel, S. van Bommel, J. de Koning, E. Turnhout
Place of PublicationDordrecht
Pages193-216
Number of pages265
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Publication series

NameWorld forests
PublisherSpringer
Number14

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Where management practices and experiential practices meet: public support and conflict in ecosystem management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this