What We Know about Software Test Maturity and Test Process Improvement

Vahid Garousi, Michael Felderer, Tuna Hacaloglu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In many companies, software testing practices and processes are far from mature and are usually conducted in an ad hoc fashion. Such immature practices lead to negative outcomes - for example, testing that doesn't detect all the defects or that incurs cost and schedule overruns. To conduct test maturity assessment (TMA) and test process improvement (TPI) systematically, researchers and practitioners have proposed various approaches and frameworks. Motivated by a recent industrial project in TMA and TPI and wanting to identify the state of the art and practice in this area, researchers conducted a review of both the scientific literature and practitioners' gray literature (for example, blog posts). The review identified 58 test maturity models and many sources with varying degrees of empirical evidence. The review's results can serve as an evidence-based overview of and index to the vast body of knowledge in this important, fast-growing area. Using this knowledge, both researchers and practitioners should be able to assess and improve the maturity of test processes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number8239941
Pages (from-to)84-92
JournalIEEE Software
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Keywords

  • multivocal literature review
  • software development
  • software engineering
  • software testing
  • systematic literature review
  • test maturity
  • test maturity assessment
  • Test Maturity Model Integration
  • test process assessment
  • test process improvement
  • TMA
  • TMMi
  • TPI

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What We Know about Software Test Maturity and Test Process Improvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this