What scope for certifying forest ecosystem services?

Erik Meijaard*, Sven Wunder, Manuel R. Guariguata, Douglas Sheil

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecosystem services have rapidly moved to the mainstream of environmental policies. Certification has for decades been a market-based tool for sustainability. Here, we assess whether certification of ecosystem services supports forest management and conservation. We look at forest ecosystem services, such as water regulation, carbon sequestration, and pollination provision, and evaluate the opportunities and constraints for developing systems to certify them. We discuss a series of challenges, and suggest that caution is needed: insufficient demand for multiple services, high biophysical service complexity, and elevated monitoring costs all indicate that opportunities for large-scale commercial viability of certified forest ecosystem services are limited. While some certification already exists for forest carbon services, we expect the certification of other services to remain a minor niche that seldom justifies major subsidies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-166
Number of pages7
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Carbon
  • Co-benefits
  • Monitoring
  • Payment for environmental services
  • Trade off

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What scope for certifying forest ecosystem services?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this