Water Footprint of Food Quality Schemes

Antonio Bodini*, Sara Chiussi, Michele Donati, Valentin Bellassen, Áron Török, Lisbeth Dries, Dubravka Sinčić Đorić, Lisa Gauvrit, Efthimia Tsakiridou, Edward Majewski, Bojan Ristic, Zaklina Stojanovic, Jose Maria Gil Roig, Apichaya Lilavanichakul, Nguyán Quánh An, Filippo Arfini

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Water Footprint (WF, henceforth) is an indicator of water consumption and has taken ground to assess the impact of agricultural production processes over freshwater. The focus of this study was contrasting non-conventional, certified products with identical products obtained through conventional production schemes (REF, henceforth) using WF as a measure of their pressure on water resources. The aim was to the show whether products that are certified as Food Quality Schemes (FQS, henceforth) could also incorporate the lower impact on water among their quality features. To perform this comparison, we analysed 23 products selected among Organic, PDO and PGI as FQS, and their conventional counterparts. By restricting the domain of analysis to the on-farm phase of the production chain, we obtained that that no significant differences emerged between the FQS and REF products. However, if the impact is measured per unit area rather than per unit product, FQS showed a significant reduction in water demand.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20190045
JournalJournal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Nov 2020

Keywords

  • agricultural production
  • crop water requirement
  • evapotranspiration
  • irrigation
  • water footprint
  • yield

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Water Footprint of Food Quality Schemes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this