'Wasteaware' benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities

D.C. Wilson, Ljiljana Rodic-Wiersma, M.J. Cowing, C.A. Velis, A.D. Whiteman, Anne Scheinberg, Recaredo Vilches, Darragh Masterson, Joachim Stretz, Barbara Oelz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper addresses a major problem in international solid waste management, which is twofold: a lack of data, and a lack of consistent data to allow comparison between cities. The paper presents an indicator set for integrated sustainable waste management (ISWM) in cities both North and South, to allow benchmarking of a city's performance, comparing cities and monitoring developments over time. It builds on pioneering work for UN-Habitat's solid waste management in the World's cities. The comprehensive analytical framework of a city's solid waste management system is divided into two overlapping 'triangles' - one comprising the three physical components, i.e. collection, recycling, and disposal, and the other comprising three governance aspects, i.e. inclusivity; financial sustainability; and sound institutions and proactive policies. The indicator set includes essential quantitative indicators as well as qualitative composite indicators. This updated and revised 'Wasteaware' set of ISWM benchmark indicators is the cumulative result of testing various prototypes in more than 50 cities around the world. This experience confirms the utility of indicators in allowing comprehensive performance measurement and comparison of both 'hard' physical components and 'soft' governance aspects; and in prioritising 'next steps' in developing a city's solid waste management system, by identifying both local strengths that can be built on and weak points to be addressed. The Wasteaware ISWM indicators are applicable to a broad range of cities with very different levels of income and solid waste management practices. Their wide application as a standard methodology will help to fill the historical data gap.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-342
JournalWaste Management
Volume35
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Waste Management
Benchmarking
waste management
Solid Waste
solid waste
world city
city
indicator
benchmarking
analytical framework
United Nations
Recycling
management practice
Ecosystem
recycling
sustainability
income
methodology

Keywords

  • Benchmark indicators
  • Developing countries
  • Governance
  • Performance monitoring
  • Recycling rates
  • Solid waste management

Cite this

Wilson, D. C., Rodic-Wiersma, L., Cowing, M. J., Velis, C. A., Whiteman, A. D., Scheinberg, A., ... Oelz, B. (2015). 'Wasteaware' benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities. Waste Management, 35, 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006
Wilson, D.C. ; Rodic-Wiersma, Ljiljana ; Cowing, M.J. ; Velis, C.A. ; Whiteman, A.D. ; Scheinberg, Anne ; Vilches, Recaredo ; Masterson, Darragh ; Stretz, Joachim ; Oelz, Barbara. / 'Wasteaware' benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities. In: Waste Management. 2015 ; Vol. 35. pp. 329-342.
@article{8f2e494f750d45d3acd052a90301e05a,
title = "'Wasteaware' benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities",
abstract = "This paper addresses a major problem in international solid waste management, which is twofold: a lack of data, and a lack of consistent data to allow comparison between cities. The paper presents an indicator set for integrated sustainable waste management (ISWM) in cities both North and South, to allow benchmarking of a city's performance, comparing cities and monitoring developments over time. It builds on pioneering work for UN-Habitat's solid waste management in the World's cities. The comprehensive analytical framework of a city's solid waste management system is divided into two overlapping 'triangles' - one comprising the three physical components, i.e. collection, recycling, and disposal, and the other comprising three governance aspects, i.e. inclusivity; financial sustainability; and sound institutions and proactive policies. The indicator set includes essential quantitative indicators as well as qualitative composite indicators. This updated and revised 'Wasteaware' set of ISWM benchmark indicators is the cumulative result of testing various prototypes in more than 50 cities around the world. This experience confirms the utility of indicators in allowing comprehensive performance measurement and comparison of both 'hard' physical components and 'soft' governance aspects; and in prioritising 'next steps' in developing a city's solid waste management system, by identifying both local strengths that can be built on and weak points to be addressed. The Wasteaware ISWM indicators are applicable to a broad range of cities with very different levels of income and solid waste management practices. Their wide application as a standard methodology will help to fill the historical data gap.",
keywords = "Benchmark indicators, Developing countries, Governance, Performance monitoring, Recycling rates, Solid waste management",
author = "D.C. Wilson and Ljiljana Rodic-Wiersma and M.J. Cowing and C.A. Velis and A.D. Whiteman and Anne Scheinberg and Recaredo Vilches and Darragh Masterson and Joachim Stretz and Barbara Oelz",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "329--342",
journal = "Waste Management",
issn = "0956-053X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Wilson, DC, Rodic-Wiersma, L, Cowing, MJ, Velis, CA, Whiteman, AD, Scheinberg, A, Vilches, R, Masterson, D, Stretz, J & Oelz, B 2015, ''Wasteaware' benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities', Waste Management, vol. 35, pp. 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006

'Wasteaware' benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities. / Wilson, D.C.; Rodic-Wiersma, Ljiljana; Cowing, M.J.; Velis, C.A.; Whiteman, A.D.; Scheinberg, Anne; Vilches, Recaredo; Masterson, Darragh; Stretz, Joachim; Oelz, Barbara.

In: Waste Management, Vol. 35, 2015, p. 329-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Wasteaware' benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities

AU - Wilson, D.C.

AU - Rodic-Wiersma, Ljiljana

AU - Cowing, M.J.

AU - Velis, C.A.

AU - Whiteman, A.D.

AU - Scheinberg, Anne

AU - Vilches, Recaredo

AU - Masterson, Darragh

AU - Stretz, Joachim

AU - Oelz, Barbara

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper addresses a major problem in international solid waste management, which is twofold: a lack of data, and a lack of consistent data to allow comparison between cities. The paper presents an indicator set for integrated sustainable waste management (ISWM) in cities both North and South, to allow benchmarking of a city's performance, comparing cities and monitoring developments over time. It builds on pioneering work for UN-Habitat's solid waste management in the World's cities. The comprehensive analytical framework of a city's solid waste management system is divided into two overlapping 'triangles' - one comprising the three physical components, i.e. collection, recycling, and disposal, and the other comprising three governance aspects, i.e. inclusivity; financial sustainability; and sound institutions and proactive policies. The indicator set includes essential quantitative indicators as well as qualitative composite indicators. This updated and revised 'Wasteaware' set of ISWM benchmark indicators is the cumulative result of testing various prototypes in more than 50 cities around the world. This experience confirms the utility of indicators in allowing comprehensive performance measurement and comparison of both 'hard' physical components and 'soft' governance aspects; and in prioritising 'next steps' in developing a city's solid waste management system, by identifying both local strengths that can be built on and weak points to be addressed. The Wasteaware ISWM indicators are applicable to a broad range of cities with very different levels of income and solid waste management practices. Their wide application as a standard methodology will help to fill the historical data gap.

AB - This paper addresses a major problem in international solid waste management, which is twofold: a lack of data, and a lack of consistent data to allow comparison between cities. The paper presents an indicator set for integrated sustainable waste management (ISWM) in cities both North and South, to allow benchmarking of a city's performance, comparing cities and monitoring developments over time. It builds on pioneering work for UN-Habitat's solid waste management in the World's cities. The comprehensive analytical framework of a city's solid waste management system is divided into two overlapping 'triangles' - one comprising the three physical components, i.e. collection, recycling, and disposal, and the other comprising three governance aspects, i.e. inclusivity; financial sustainability; and sound institutions and proactive policies. The indicator set includes essential quantitative indicators as well as qualitative composite indicators. This updated and revised 'Wasteaware' set of ISWM benchmark indicators is the cumulative result of testing various prototypes in more than 50 cities around the world. This experience confirms the utility of indicators in allowing comprehensive performance measurement and comparison of both 'hard' physical components and 'soft' governance aspects; and in prioritising 'next steps' in developing a city's solid waste management system, by identifying both local strengths that can be built on and weak points to be addressed. The Wasteaware ISWM indicators are applicable to a broad range of cities with very different levels of income and solid waste management practices. Their wide application as a standard methodology will help to fill the historical data gap.

KW - Benchmark indicators

KW - Developing countries

KW - Governance

KW - Performance monitoring

KW - Recycling rates

KW - Solid waste management

U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 329

EP - 342

JO - Waste Management

JF - Waste Management

SN - 0956-053X

ER -

Wilson DC, Rodic-Wiersma L, Cowing MJ, Velis CA, Whiteman AD, Scheinberg A et al. 'Wasteaware' benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities. Waste Management. 2015;35:329-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006