Village Dogs in Coastal Mexico: The Streets as a Place to belong

Eliza Ruiz Izaguirre*, P.G.M. Hebinck, C.H.A.M. Eilers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Village dogs are important for households in coastal Mexico, yet they are seen as out of place by etic stakeholders (public health and wildlife experts, and animal welfarists). Caregivers of village dogs are considered irresponsible, a view that is reinforced by Mexican policy. We describe two contrasting etic discourses in this article that have emerged from ideologies based on human-dog relation theories. The article is part of an ongoing shift in the social sciences that has seen attempts to move beyond anthropocentrism and to explore human-animal relations outside the parameters of the traditional nature-culture dichotomy. Local narratives hinge on different experiences with dogs. Villagers perceive their dogs as adults, capable of and subject to judgment. Etic discourses are currently the basis for dog management policies. Attaching the label of “irresponsible owner” to the caregivers of village dogs prevents their inclusion as legitimate participants in policy processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)510–530
Number of pages21
JournalSociety and Animals
Volume28
Issue number5-6
Early online date2 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Village Dogs in Coastal Mexico: The Streets as a Place to belong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this