Video monitoring of brown planthopper predation in rice shows flaws of sentinel methods

Yi Zou, Joop De Kraker, Felix J.J.A. Bianchi, Mario D. Van Telgen, Haijun Xiao*, Wopke Van Der Werf

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Immobilized preys are routinely used in agro-ecological exposure studies to quantify predation of pests under field conditions, but this method has not been validated. Our purpose was to determine the validity of using immobilized adults of the major rice pest Nilaparvata lugens, brown plant hopper (BPH), as sentinels. We used direct observation by video recording to determine the causal agents of removal of field exposed BPH sentinels with two experiments: 1) we recorded removal events of dead, immobilized BPH; and 2) we compared removal of (i) dead, immobilized BPH, (ii) live, immobilized BPH, and (iii) live, mobile BPH. Long-horned grasshoppers were responsible for most removals of dead, immobilized BPH, in both experiments. Predatory ground beetles removed most of the live, immobilized BPH, whereas frogs were the major predators of live, mobile BPH. Overall, we showed that removal of immobilized sentinel prey is not representative for predation of live, mobile prey, stressing the need for a critical assessment of commonly used sentinel methods. In addition, we found that frogs played the major role in predation of BPH in rice. As current strategies to enhance biocontrol of planthoppers in rice focus on arthropod natural enemies, this finding could have major implications.
Original languageEnglish
Article number42210
JournalScientific Reports
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Video monitoring of brown planthopper predation in rice shows flaws of sentinel methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this