Using successful inseminations to evaluate sensitivity of automated heat detection systems

C. Kamphuis, K. Huijps

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paperAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Automated oestrus detection systems are becoming a mainstream technology on dairy farms. A previous study demonstrated that these systems generate heat alerts too early or too late in comparison to progesterone-defined oestrus events. That study, however, included only 30 cases. The current study used successful inseminations as reference to evaluate sensitivity of heat detection systems. Data were collected on two farms from January through July 2014 and included insemination records and heat alerts from three different automated heat detection system. One system was implemented on both farms, and each farm had a second, different, heat detection system running simultaneously. Insemination records were used to identify successful inseminations (n = 282; 153 on Farm 1 and 129 on Farm 2). The day each system generated heat alerts was compared with the day of successful insemination to calculate the sensitivity for successful inseminations. Sensitivity was also assessed per parity (1, 2 or ≥3) and per lactation stage (≤56 and >56 days in milk) within each system. Using a two-day time window (day of successful insemination and previous day) for a system to generate an alert, sensitivities were 35%, 87%, and 94% for system A, B, and C, respectively. Systems had lower sensitivity levels for heifers (parity 1) and system B appeared to have higher sensitivity levels for successful inseminations during the first 56 days of lactation. Despite small differences in sensitivity levels for the different parity groups and lactation stages, there appeared to be no differences of practical relevance. Results suggested no necessity for parity specific or lactation stage specific algorithms to improve detection performance of heat detection systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages381-389
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Event7th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, ECPLF 2015 - Milan, Italy
Duration: 15 Sep 201518 Sep 2015

Conference

Conference7th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, ECPLF 2015
CountryItaly
CityMilan
Period15/09/1518/09/15

Fingerprint

insemination
heat
parity (reproduction)
lactation stage
farms
estrus detection
dairy farming
estrus
heifers
progesterone
lactation
milk

Cite this

Kamphuis, C., & Huijps, K. (2015). Using successful inseminations to evaluate sensitivity of automated heat detection systems. 381-389. Paper presented at 7th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, ECPLF 2015, Milan, Italy.
Kamphuis, C. ; Huijps, K. / Using successful inseminations to evaluate sensitivity of automated heat detection systems. Paper presented at 7th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, ECPLF 2015, Milan, Italy.
@conference{b54558d902124dd1a1b6640b8203f277,
title = "Using successful inseminations to evaluate sensitivity of automated heat detection systems",
abstract = "Automated oestrus detection systems are becoming a mainstream technology on dairy farms. A previous study demonstrated that these systems generate heat alerts too early or too late in comparison to progesterone-defined oestrus events. That study, however, included only 30 cases. The current study used successful inseminations as reference to evaluate sensitivity of heat detection systems. Data were collected on two farms from January through July 2014 and included insemination records and heat alerts from three different automated heat detection system. One system was implemented on both farms, and each farm had a second, different, heat detection system running simultaneously. Insemination records were used to identify successful inseminations (n = 282; 153 on Farm 1 and 129 on Farm 2). The day each system generated heat alerts was compared with the day of successful insemination to calculate the sensitivity for successful inseminations. Sensitivity was also assessed per parity (1, 2 or ≥3) and per lactation stage (≤56 and >56 days in milk) within each system. Using a two-day time window (day of successful insemination and previous day) for a system to generate an alert, sensitivities were 35{\%}, 87{\%}, and 94{\%} for system A, B, and C, respectively. Systems had lower sensitivity levels for heifers (parity 1) and system B appeared to have higher sensitivity levels for successful inseminations during the first 56 days of lactation. Despite small differences in sensitivity levels for the different parity groups and lactation stages, there appeared to be no differences of practical relevance. Results suggested no necessity for parity specific or lactation stage specific algorithms to improve detection performance of heat detection systems.",
author = "C. Kamphuis and K. Huijps",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
pages = "381--389",
note = "7th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, ECPLF 2015 ; Conference date: 15-09-2015 Through 18-09-2015",

}

Kamphuis, C & Huijps, K 2015, 'Using successful inseminations to evaluate sensitivity of automated heat detection systems' Paper presented at 7th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, ECPLF 2015, Milan, Italy, 15/09/15 - 18/09/15, pp. 381-389.

Using successful inseminations to evaluate sensitivity of automated heat detection systems. / Kamphuis, C.; Huijps, K.

2015. 381-389 Paper presented at 7th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, ECPLF 2015, Milan, Italy.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paperAcademicpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Using successful inseminations to evaluate sensitivity of automated heat detection systems

AU - Kamphuis, C.

AU - Huijps, K.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Automated oestrus detection systems are becoming a mainstream technology on dairy farms. A previous study demonstrated that these systems generate heat alerts too early or too late in comparison to progesterone-defined oestrus events. That study, however, included only 30 cases. The current study used successful inseminations as reference to evaluate sensitivity of heat detection systems. Data were collected on two farms from January through July 2014 and included insemination records and heat alerts from three different automated heat detection system. One system was implemented on both farms, and each farm had a second, different, heat detection system running simultaneously. Insemination records were used to identify successful inseminations (n = 282; 153 on Farm 1 and 129 on Farm 2). The day each system generated heat alerts was compared with the day of successful insemination to calculate the sensitivity for successful inseminations. Sensitivity was also assessed per parity (1, 2 or ≥3) and per lactation stage (≤56 and >56 days in milk) within each system. Using a two-day time window (day of successful insemination and previous day) for a system to generate an alert, sensitivities were 35%, 87%, and 94% for system A, B, and C, respectively. Systems had lower sensitivity levels for heifers (parity 1) and system B appeared to have higher sensitivity levels for successful inseminations during the first 56 days of lactation. Despite small differences in sensitivity levels for the different parity groups and lactation stages, there appeared to be no differences of practical relevance. Results suggested no necessity for parity specific or lactation stage specific algorithms to improve detection performance of heat detection systems.

AB - Automated oestrus detection systems are becoming a mainstream technology on dairy farms. A previous study demonstrated that these systems generate heat alerts too early or too late in comparison to progesterone-defined oestrus events. That study, however, included only 30 cases. The current study used successful inseminations as reference to evaluate sensitivity of heat detection systems. Data were collected on two farms from January through July 2014 and included insemination records and heat alerts from three different automated heat detection system. One system was implemented on both farms, and each farm had a second, different, heat detection system running simultaneously. Insemination records were used to identify successful inseminations (n = 282; 153 on Farm 1 and 129 on Farm 2). The day each system generated heat alerts was compared with the day of successful insemination to calculate the sensitivity for successful inseminations. Sensitivity was also assessed per parity (1, 2 or ≥3) and per lactation stage (≤56 and >56 days in milk) within each system. Using a two-day time window (day of successful insemination and previous day) for a system to generate an alert, sensitivities were 35%, 87%, and 94% for system A, B, and C, respectively. Systems had lower sensitivity levels for heifers (parity 1) and system B appeared to have higher sensitivity levels for successful inseminations during the first 56 days of lactation. Despite small differences in sensitivity levels for the different parity groups and lactation stages, there appeared to be no differences of practical relevance. Results suggested no necessity for parity specific or lactation stage specific algorithms to improve detection performance of heat detection systems.

M3 - Conference paper

SP - 381

EP - 389

ER -

Kamphuis C, Huijps K. Using successful inseminations to evaluate sensitivity of automated heat detection systems. 2015. Paper presented at 7th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, ECPLF 2015, Milan, Italy.