Usable environmental knowledge from the perspective of decision-making: the logics of consequentiality, appropriateness, and meaningfulness

Art Dewulf, Nicole Klenk, Carina Wyborn, Maria Carmen Lemos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Environmental knowledge is a crucial input for public and private decision-making, yet often useful environmental knowledge appears to be unusable for decision-makers. To better understand how usable knowledge can be produced, we need to build on a better understanding of decision-making processes. We distinguish three different logics of decision-making and discuss their implications for knowledge use: (1) the logic of consequentiality, rooted in theories of rational choice, in which environmental knowledge is used because of its utilitarian value; (2) the logic of appropriateness, rooted in institutional theories, in which environmental knowledge is used because it fits existing rules and routines; and (3) the logic of meaningfulness, rooted in theories of sensemaking and interpretation, in which environmental knowledge is used because it makes sense to decision-makers. The theory and practice of environmental knowledge (co-)production can profit from considering these different logics of decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Volume42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

Fingerprint

decision making
decision maker
coproduction
decision-making process
profit
interpretation
Values
decision

Cite this

@article{bc80736a7a1f4635abf2dbf6cbf78973,
title = "Usable environmental knowledge from the perspective of decision-making: the logics of consequentiality, appropriateness, and meaningfulness",
abstract = "Environmental knowledge is a crucial input for public and private decision-making, yet often useful environmental knowledge appears to be unusable for decision-makers. To better understand how usable knowledge can be produced, we need to build on a better understanding of decision-making processes. We distinguish three different logics of decision-making and discuss their implications for knowledge use: (1) the logic of consequentiality, rooted in theories of rational choice, in which environmental knowledge is used because of its utilitarian value; (2) the logic of appropriateness, rooted in institutional theories, in which environmental knowledge is used because it fits existing rules and routines; and (3) the logic of meaningfulness, rooted in theories of sensemaking and interpretation, in which environmental knowledge is used because it makes sense to decision-makers. The theory and practice of environmental knowledge (co-)production can profit from considering these different logics of decision-making.",
author = "Art Dewulf and Nicole Klenk and Carina Wyborn and Lemos, {Maria Carmen}",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.003",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability",
issn = "1877-3435",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Usable environmental knowledge from the perspective of decision-making: the logics of consequentiality, appropriateness, and meaningfulness. / Dewulf, Art; Klenk, Nicole; Wyborn, Carina; Lemos, Maria Carmen.

In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 42, 01.02.2020, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Usable environmental knowledge from the perspective of decision-making: the logics of consequentiality, appropriateness, and meaningfulness

AU - Dewulf, Art

AU - Klenk, Nicole

AU - Wyborn, Carina

AU - Lemos, Maria Carmen

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - Environmental knowledge is a crucial input for public and private decision-making, yet often useful environmental knowledge appears to be unusable for decision-makers. To better understand how usable knowledge can be produced, we need to build on a better understanding of decision-making processes. We distinguish three different logics of decision-making and discuss their implications for knowledge use: (1) the logic of consequentiality, rooted in theories of rational choice, in which environmental knowledge is used because of its utilitarian value; (2) the logic of appropriateness, rooted in institutional theories, in which environmental knowledge is used because it fits existing rules and routines; and (3) the logic of meaningfulness, rooted in theories of sensemaking and interpretation, in which environmental knowledge is used because it makes sense to decision-makers. The theory and practice of environmental knowledge (co-)production can profit from considering these different logics of decision-making.

AB - Environmental knowledge is a crucial input for public and private decision-making, yet often useful environmental knowledge appears to be unusable for decision-makers. To better understand how usable knowledge can be produced, we need to build on a better understanding of decision-making processes. We distinguish three different logics of decision-making and discuss their implications for knowledge use: (1) the logic of consequentiality, rooted in theories of rational choice, in which environmental knowledge is used because of its utilitarian value; (2) the logic of appropriateness, rooted in institutional theories, in which environmental knowledge is used because it fits existing rules and routines; and (3) the logic of meaningfulness, rooted in theories of sensemaking and interpretation, in which environmental knowledge is used because it makes sense to decision-makers. The theory and practice of environmental knowledge (co-)production can profit from considering these different logics of decision-making.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.003

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

SN - 1877-3435

ER -