Unfair Trading Practices in the Food Supply Chain: Regulating Right?

H. Schebesta, Tom Verdonk, K. Purnhagen, Bert Keirsbilck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This report examines the pending Proposal for a directive on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the food supply chain, and its proposed amendments. It provides a general overview of the current content of the Proposal and analyses the proposed rules from a legal perspective. We find that: (1) the CAP legal basis may prove insufficient for regulation that covers the entire agri-food chain; and may (2) result in a strained relationship with the competition and consumer acquis; (3) the empirical basis for the prevalence of unfair trading practices, and the effect of their prohibition is relatively dire, which results in uncertainty with regard to the achievement of the future UTPD’s intended effect and effectiveness; (4) the choice for specific targeted prohibitions instead of general umbrella clauses may lead to ad hoc regulation that leaves large loopholes; (5) the institutional enforcement mechanism makes it likely that the Proposal contributes to the foundation for a new area of EU law, which will increasingly regulate practices in business-to-business relationships.
LanguageEnglish
Pages690-700
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Risk Regulation
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Food supply
food supply
Supply chains
business relationship
regulation
CAP
Industry
legal basis
European Law
amendment
uncertainty
food

Cite this

@article{e9f079df09324d6f8a42b2e77eb94dc1,
title = "Unfair Trading Practices in the Food Supply Chain: Regulating Right?",
abstract = "This report examines the pending Proposal for a directive on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the food supply chain, and its proposed amendments. It provides a general overview of the current content of the Proposal and analyses the proposed rules from a legal perspective. We find that: (1) the CAP legal basis may prove insufficient for regulation that covers the entire agri-food chain; and may (2) result in a strained relationship with the competition and consumer acquis; (3) the empirical basis for the prevalence of unfair trading practices, and the effect of their prohibition is relatively dire, which results in uncertainty with regard to the achievement of the future UTPD’s intended effect and effectiveness; (4) the choice for specific targeted prohibitions instead of general umbrella clauses may lead to ad hoc regulation that leaves large loopholes; (5) the institutional enforcement mechanism makes it likely that the Proposal contributes to the foundation for a new area of EU law, which will increasingly regulate practices in business-to-business relationships.",
author = "H. Schebesta and Tom Verdonk and K. Purnhagen and Bert Keirsbilck",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1017/err.2019.2",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "690--700",
journal = "European Journal of Risk Regulation",
issn = "1867-299X",
publisher = "Lexxion",
number = "4",

}

Unfair Trading Practices in the Food Supply Chain: Regulating Right? / Schebesta, H.; Verdonk, Tom; Purnhagen, K.; Keirsbilck, Bert.

In: European Journal of Risk Regulation, Vol. 9, No. 4, 12.2018, p. 690-700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unfair Trading Practices in the Food Supply Chain: Regulating Right?

AU - Schebesta, H.

AU - Verdonk, Tom

AU - Purnhagen, K.

AU - Keirsbilck, Bert

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - This report examines the pending Proposal for a directive on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the food supply chain, and its proposed amendments. It provides a general overview of the current content of the Proposal and analyses the proposed rules from a legal perspective. We find that: (1) the CAP legal basis may prove insufficient for regulation that covers the entire agri-food chain; and may (2) result in a strained relationship with the competition and consumer acquis; (3) the empirical basis for the prevalence of unfair trading practices, and the effect of their prohibition is relatively dire, which results in uncertainty with regard to the achievement of the future UTPD’s intended effect and effectiveness; (4) the choice for specific targeted prohibitions instead of general umbrella clauses may lead to ad hoc regulation that leaves large loopholes; (5) the institutional enforcement mechanism makes it likely that the Proposal contributes to the foundation for a new area of EU law, which will increasingly regulate practices in business-to-business relationships.

AB - This report examines the pending Proposal for a directive on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the food supply chain, and its proposed amendments. It provides a general overview of the current content of the Proposal and analyses the proposed rules from a legal perspective. We find that: (1) the CAP legal basis may prove insufficient for regulation that covers the entire agri-food chain; and may (2) result in a strained relationship with the competition and consumer acquis; (3) the empirical basis for the prevalence of unfair trading practices, and the effect of their prohibition is relatively dire, which results in uncertainty with regard to the achievement of the future UTPD’s intended effect and effectiveness; (4) the choice for specific targeted prohibitions instead of general umbrella clauses may lead to ad hoc regulation that leaves large loopholes; (5) the institutional enforcement mechanism makes it likely that the Proposal contributes to the foundation for a new area of EU law, which will increasingly regulate practices in business-to-business relationships.

U2 - 10.1017/err.2019.2

DO - 10.1017/err.2019.2

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 690

EP - 700

JO - European Journal of Risk Regulation

T2 - European Journal of Risk Regulation

JF - European Journal of Risk Regulation

SN - 1867-299X

IS - 4

ER -