Understanding voluntary program performance

Introducing the diffusion network perspective

Jeroen van der Heijden*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Voluntary programs have rapidly become a means for the public, private, and third sectors to regulate and govern complex societal problems. Following the rapid and widespread emergence of these programs, scholars have been active in mapping, exploring, and interrogating their design and performance. Considerable advances have been made in describing program design and context conditions, and the actors involved in the voluntary program that relate to program performance. Less is known, however, about how these conditions affect program performance. Starting with one of the dominant theories on voluntary programs, the club theory perspective, this article seeks to understand how different program design conditions interact to affect the performance of 26 voluntary programs for low carbon building and city development in Australia, the Netherlands, and the United States. Applying qualitative comparative analysis, the study finds that the club theory perspective has limited explanatory power for this specific set of cases. Iterative rounds of analysis indicate that a diffusion network perspective is the best complementary perspective for explaining the performance of this set of programs. The article concludes that, in situations of a non-homogeneous market of voluntary program participants, a focus on the programs’ diffusion networks helps to explain their performance. This has implications for the design and implementation of such programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-62
Number of pages19
JournalRegulation and Governance
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

performance
club
Netherlands
market

Keywords

  • built environment
  • club theory
  • qualitative comparative analysis
  • urban climate governance
  • voluntary program

Cite this

@article{c49d9395225240daaa15aed57569064e,
title = "Understanding voluntary program performance: Introducing the diffusion network perspective",
abstract = "Voluntary programs have rapidly become a means for the public, private, and third sectors to regulate and govern complex societal problems. Following the rapid and widespread emergence of these programs, scholars have been active in mapping, exploring, and interrogating their design and performance. Considerable advances have been made in describing program design and context conditions, and the actors involved in the voluntary program that relate to program performance. Less is known, however, about how these conditions affect program performance. Starting with one of the dominant theories on voluntary programs, the club theory perspective, this article seeks to understand how different program design conditions interact to affect the performance of 26 voluntary programs for low carbon building and city development in Australia, the Netherlands, and the United States. Applying qualitative comparative analysis, the study finds that the club theory perspective has limited explanatory power for this specific set of cases. Iterative rounds of analysis indicate that a diffusion network perspective is the best complementary perspective for explaining the performance of this set of programs. The article concludes that, in situations of a non-homogeneous market of voluntary program participants, a focus on the programs’ diffusion networks helps to explain their performance. This has implications for the design and implementation of such programs.",
keywords = "built environment, club theory, qualitative comparative analysis, urban climate governance, voluntary program",
author = "{van der Heijden}, Jeroen",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/rego.12192",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "44--62",
journal = "Regulation & Governance",
issn = "1748-5983",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Understanding voluntary program performance : Introducing the diffusion network perspective. / van der Heijden, Jeroen.

In: Regulation and Governance, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.01.2020, p. 44-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding voluntary program performance

T2 - Introducing the diffusion network perspective

AU - van der Heijden, Jeroen

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Voluntary programs have rapidly become a means for the public, private, and third sectors to regulate and govern complex societal problems. Following the rapid and widespread emergence of these programs, scholars have been active in mapping, exploring, and interrogating their design and performance. Considerable advances have been made in describing program design and context conditions, and the actors involved in the voluntary program that relate to program performance. Less is known, however, about how these conditions affect program performance. Starting with one of the dominant theories on voluntary programs, the club theory perspective, this article seeks to understand how different program design conditions interact to affect the performance of 26 voluntary programs for low carbon building and city development in Australia, the Netherlands, and the United States. Applying qualitative comparative analysis, the study finds that the club theory perspective has limited explanatory power for this specific set of cases. Iterative rounds of analysis indicate that a diffusion network perspective is the best complementary perspective for explaining the performance of this set of programs. The article concludes that, in situations of a non-homogeneous market of voluntary program participants, a focus on the programs’ diffusion networks helps to explain their performance. This has implications for the design and implementation of such programs.

AB - Voluntary programs have rapidly become a means for the public, private, and third sectors to regulate and govern complex societal problems. Following the rapid and widespread emergence of these programs, scholars have been active in mapping, exploring, and interrogating their design and performance. Considerable advances have been made in describing program design and context conditions, and the actors involved in the voluntary program that relate to program performance. Less is known, however, about how these conditions affect program performance. Starting with one of the dominant theories on voluntary programs, the club theory perspective, this article seeks to understand how different program design conditions interact to affect the performance of 26 voluntary programs for low carbon building and city development in Australia, the Netherlands, and the United States. Applying qualitative comparative analysis, the study finds that the club theory perspective has limited explanatory power for this specific set of cases. Iterative rounds of analysis indicate that a diffusion network perspective is the best complementary perspective for explaining the performance of this set of programs. The article concludes that, in situations of a non-homogeneous market of voluntary program participants, a focus on the programs’ diffusion networks helps to explain their performance. This has implications for the design and implementation of such programs.

KW - built environment

KW - club theory

KW - qualitative comparative analysis

KW - urban climate governance

KW - voluntary program

U2 - 10.1111/rego.12192

DO - 10.1111/rego.12192

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 44

EP - 62

JO - Regulation & Governance

JF - Regulation & Governance

SN - 1748-5983

IS - 1

ER -