Understanding the acceptability of wolf management actions: Roles of cognition and emotion

Tanya M. Straka, Kelly Miller, M.H. Jacobs*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Wolf management actions are seldom universally accepted and understanding diverse opinions is of value for conservation practitioners. Previous research has either investigated cognitions or emotions to understand public acceptability of wolf management actions. We investigated both concepts simultaneously to identify whether their predictive potentials are mutually exclusive. A survey measuring wildlife value orientations, valence (positive-negative emotions) toward wolves, and responses to wolf management actions (doing nothing, public education, lethal control) was completed by 597 Dutch and German university students. Valence predicted the acceptability of all wolf management actions. Wildlife value orientations predicted the acceptability of lethal control and partially public education but not of doing nothing. Emotions thus added predictive potential next to cognitions to understand responses to wolf management actions. For both research and practice, it is important to acknowledge that the acceptability of wolf management actions is not only guided by what people think, but also by what they feel.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-46
JournalHuman Dimensions of Wildlife
Volume25
Issue number1
Early online date24 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

cognition
education
student
public

Cite this

@article{0398c7f5e1da45c196af207906bd3a56,
title = "Understanding the acceptability of wolf management actions: Roles of cognition and emotion",
abstract = "Wolf management actions are seldom universally accepted and understanding diverse opinions is of value for conservation practitioners. Previous research has either investigated cognitions or emotions to understand public acceptability of wolf management actions. We investigated both concepts simultaneously to identify whether their predictive potentials are mutually exclusive. A survey measuring wildlife value orientations, valence (positive-negative emotions) toward wolves, and responses to wolf management actions (doing nothing, public education, lethal control) was completed by 597 Dutch and German university students. Valence predicted the acceptability of all wolf management actions. Wildlife value orientations predicted the acceptability of lethal control and partially public education but not of doing nothing. Emotions thus added predictive potential next to cognitions to understand responses to wolf management actions. For both research and practice, it is important to acknowledge that the acceptability of wolf management actions is not only guided by what people think, but also by what they feel.",
author = "Straka, {Tanya M.} and Kelly Miller and M.H. Jacobs",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/10871209.2019.1680774",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "33--46",
journal = "Human Dimensions of Wildlife",
issn = "1087-1209",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Understanding the acceptability of wolf management actions: Roles of cognition and emotion. / Straka, Tanya M.; Miller, Kelly; Jacobs, M.H.

In: Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2020, p. 33-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the acceptability of wolf management actions: Roles of cognition and emotion

AU - Straka, Tanya M.

AU - Miller, Kelly

AU - Jacobs, M.H.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Wolf management actions are seldom universally accepted and understanding diverse opinions is of value for conservation practitioners. Previous research has either investigated cognitions or emotions to understand public acceptability of wolf management actions. We investigated both concepts simultaneously to identify whether their predictive potentials are mutually exclusive. A survey measuring wildlife value orientations, valence (positive-negative emotions) toward wolves, and responses to wolf management actions (doing nothing, public education, lethal control) was completed by 597 Dutch and German university students. Valence predicted the acceptability of all wolf management actions. Wildlife value orientations predicted the acceptability of lethal control and partially public education but not of doing nothing. Emotions thus added predictive potential next to cognitions to understand responses to wolf management actions. For both research and practice, it is important to acknowledge that the acceptability of wolf management actions is not only guided by what people think, but also by what they feel.

AB - Wolf management actions are seldom universally accepted and understanding diverse opinions is of value for conservation practitioners. Previous research has either investigated cognitions or emotions to understand public acceptability of wolf management actions. We investigated both concepts simultaneously to identify whether their predictive potentials are mutually exclusive. A survey measuring wildlife value orientations, valence (positive-negative emotions) toward wolves, and responses to wolf management actions (doing nothing, public education, lethal control) was completed by 597 Dutch and German university students. Valence predicted the acceptability of all wolf management actions. Wildlife value orientations predicted the acceptability of lethal control and partially public education but not of doing nothing. Emotions thus added predictive potential next to cognitions to understand responses to wolf management actions. For both research and practice, it is important to acknowledge that the acceptability of wolf management actions is not only guided by what people think, but also by what they feel.

U2 - 10.1080/10871209.2019.1680774

DO - 10.1080/10871209.2019.1680774

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 33

EP - 46

JO - Human Dimensions of Wildlife

JF - Human Dimensions of Wildlife

SN - 1087-1209

IS - 1

ER -