Ultra-processed foods and health: are we correctly interpreting the available evidence?

Francesco Visioli*, Daniele Del Rio, Vincenzo Fogliano, Franca Marangoni, Cristian Ricci, Andrea Poli

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several studies have linked adverse health effects to the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) according to the NOVA classification. However, whether the consumption of UPF is the actual causal factor for such health outcomes is still unknown. Indeed, different groups of UPF examined in the same epidemiologic study often show markedly different associations with the occurrence of the health endpoints. In this Comment, we discuss some such studies and point out that the available evidence on how different UPFs have been associated with health, as well as the results of studies examining specific food additives, call into question the possibility that ultra-processing per se is the real culprit. It is possible that other unaccounted for confounding factors play an important role. Future, urgently needed studies will clarify this issue.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-180
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume79
Issue number3
Early online date26 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ultra-processed foods and health: are we correctly interpreting the available evidence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this