Tuber proteome comparison of five potato varieties by principal component analysis

Carla Souza de Mello, Jeroen P. Van Dijk, Marleen Voorhuijzen, Esther J. Kok, Ana Carolina Maisonnave Arisi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data analysis of omics data should be performed by multivariate analysis such as principal component analysis (PCA). The way data are clustered in PCA is of major importance to develop some classification systems based on multivariate analysis, such as soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA). In a previous study a one-class classifier based on SIMCA was built using microarray data from a set of potatoes. The PCA grouped the transcriptomic data according to varieties. The present work aimed to use PCA to verify the clustering of the proteomic profiles for the same potato varieties. RESULTS: Proteomic profiles of five potato varieties (Biogold, Fontane, Innovator, Lady Rosetta and Maris Piper) were evaluated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) performed on two immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strip lengths, 13 and 24cm, both under pH range 4-7. For each strip length, two gels were prepared from each variety; in total there were ten gels per analysis. For 13cm strips, 199-320 spots were detected per gel, and for 24cm strips, 365-684 spots. CONCLUSION: All four PCAs performed with these datasets presented clear grouping of samples according to the varieties. The data presented here showed that PCA was applicable for proteomic analysis of potato and was able to separate the samples by varieties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3928-3936
JournalJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Volume96
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • 2-DE, proteomics
  • PCA
  • Two-dimensional electrophoresis

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Tuber proteome comparison of five potato varieties by principal component analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this