Transparency to what End? Governing by disclosure through the Biosafety Clearing House

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although transparency is a key concept in the social sciences, it remains an understudied phenomenon in global environmental governance. This paper analyzes effectiveness of ‘governance by transparency’ or governance by information disclosure as a key innovation in global environmental and risk governance. Information disclosure is central to current efforts to govern biosafety or safe trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Through analyzing the dynamics of GMO-related information disclosure to the global Biosafety Clearing House (BCH), I argue that the originally intended normative and procedural aims of disclosure in this case—to facilitate a GMO-importing country’s right to know and right to choose prior to trade in GMOs—are not yet being realized, partly because the burden of BCH disclosure currently rests, ironically, on importing countries. As a result, BCH disclosure may even have market-facilitating rather than originally intended market-regulating effects with regard to GMO trade, turning on its head the intended aims of governance by disclosure
LanguageEnglish
Pages128-144
JournalEnvironment and Planning C. Government and Policy
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

biosafety
genetically modified organism
transparency
governance
market
innovation
social science

Keywords

  • right-to-know
  • global environmental assessments
  • information disclosure
  • cartagena protocol
  • scientific advice
  • governance
  • accountability
  • politics
  • south
  • risk

Cite this

@article{9af8e8e3357544d1a036b577f300724b,
title = "Transparency to what End? Governing by disclosure through the Biosafety Clearing House",
abstract = "Although transparency is a key concept in the social sciences, it remains an understudied phenomenon in global environmental governance. This paper analyzes effectiveness of ‘governance by transparency’ or governance by information disclosure as a key innovation in global environmental and risk governance. Information disclosure is central to current efforts to govern biosafety or safe trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Through analyzing the dynamics of GMO-related information disclosure to the global Biosafety Clearing House (BCH), I argue that the originally intended normative and procedural aims of disclosure in this case—to facilitate a GMO-importing country’s right to know and right to choose prior to trade in GMOs—are not yet being realized, partly because the burden of BCH disclosure currently rests, ironically, on importing countries. As a result, BCH disclosure may even have market-facilitating rather than originally intended market-regulating effects with regard to GMO trade, turning on its head the intended aims of governance by disclosure",
keywords = "right-to-know, global environmental assessments, information disclosure, cartagena protocol, scientific advice, governance, accountability, politics, south, risk",
author = "A. Gupta",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1068/c08137",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "128--144",
journal = "Environment and Planning C. Government and Policy",
issn = "0263-774X",
publisher = "Pion",
number = "2",

}

Transparency to what End? Governing by disclosure through the Biosafety Clearing House. / Gupta, A.

In: Environment and Planning C. Government and Policy, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2010, p. 128-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transparency to what End? Governing by disclosure through the Biosafety Clearing House

AU - Gupta, A.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Although transparency is a key concept in the social sciences, it remains an understudied phenomenon in global environmental governance. This paper analyzes effectiveness of ‘governance by transparency’ or governance by information disclosure as a key innovation in global environmental and risk governance. Information disclosure is central to current efforts to govern biosafety or safe trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Through analyzing the dynamics of GMO-related information disclosure to the global Biosafety Clearing House (BCH), I argue that the originally intended normative and procedural aims of disclosure in this case—to facilitate a GMO-importing country’s right to know and right to choose prior to trade in GMOs—are not yet being realized, partly because the burden of BCH disclosure currently rests, ironically, on importing countries. As a result, BCH disclosure may even have market-facilitating rather than originally intended market-regulating effects with regard to GMO trade, turning on its head the intended aims of governance by disclosure

AB - Although transparency is a key concept in the social sciences, it remains an understudied phenomenon in global environmental governance. This paper analyzes effectiveness of ‘governance by transparency’ or governance by information disclosure as a key innovation in global environmental and risk governance. Information disclosure is central to current efforts to govern biosafety or safe trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Through analyzing the dynamics of GMO-related information disclosure to the global Biosafety Clearing House (BCH), I argue that the originally intended normative and procedural aims of disclosure in this case—to facilitate a GMO-importing country’s right to know and right to choose prior to trade in GMOs—are not yet being realized, partly because the burden of BCH disclosure currently rests, ironically, on importing countries. As a result, BCH disclosure may even have market-facilitating rather than originally intended market-regulating effects with regard to GMO trade, turning on its head the intended aims of governance by disclosure

KW - right-to-know

KW - global environmental assessments

KW - information disclosure

KW - cartagena protocol

KW - scientific advice

KW - governance

KW - accountability

KW - politics

KW - south

KW - risk

U2 - 10.1068/c08137

DO - 10.1068/c08137

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 128

EP - 144

JO - Environment and Planning C. Government and Policy

T2 - Environment and Planning C. Government and Policy

JF - Environment and Planning C. Government and Policy

SN - 0263-774X

IS - 2

ER -