Transparency in multilateral climate politics: Furthering (or distracting from) accountability?

A. Gupta*, Harro van Asselt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyzes the interplay between transparency and accountability in multilateral climate politics. The 2015 Paris Agreement calls for a “pledge-and-review” approach to collective climate action with an “enhanced transparency framework” as a key pillar of the Agreement. By making visible who is doing what, transparency is widely assumed to be vital to holding countries to account and building trust. We explore whether transparency is generating such effects in this context, by developing and applying an analytical framework to examine the link between transparency and accountability. We find that the scope and practices of climate transparency reflect (rather than necessarily reduce) broader conflicts over who should be held to account to whom and about what, with regard to responsibility and burden sharing for ambitious climate action. We conclude that the relationship between transparency and accountability is less straightforward than assumed, and that the transformative promise of transparency needs to be reconsidered in this light.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-34
JournalRegulation & Governance
Volume13
Issue number1
Early online date26 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

transparency
climate
responsibility
politics

Keywords

  • accountability
  • climate governance
  • Paris Agreement
  • transparency
  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

Cite this

@article{20b3196ac48846cbb33c314a22ea20a6,
title = "Transparency in multilateral climate politics: Furthering (or distracting from) accountability?",
abstract = "This article analyzes the interplay between transparency and accountability in multilateral climate politics. The 2015 Paris Agreement calls for a “pledge-and-review” approach to collective climate action with an “enhanced transparency framework” as a key pillar of the Agreement. By making visible who is doing what, transparency is widely assumed to be vital to holding countries to account and building trust. We explore whether transparency is generating such effects in this context, by developing and applying an analytical framework to examine the link between transparency and accountability. We find that the scope and practices of climate transparency reflect (rather than necessarily reduce) broader conflicts over who should be held to account to whom and about what, with regard to responsibility and burden sharing for ambitious climate action. We conclude that the relationship between transparency and accountability is less straightforward than assumed, and that the transformative promise of transparency needs to be reconsidered in this light.",
keywords = "accountability, climate governance, Paris Agreement, transparency, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)",
author = "A. Gupta and {van Asselt}, Harro",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/rego.12159",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "18--34",
journal = "Regulation & Governance",
issn = "1748-5983",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Transparency in multilateral climate politics: Furthering (or distracting from) accountability? / Gupta, A.; van Asselt, Harro.

In: Regulation & Governance, Vol. 13, No. 1, 03.2019, p. 18-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transparency in multilateral climate politics: Furthering (or distracting from) accountability?

AU - Gupta, A.

AU - van Asselt, Harro

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - This article analyzes the interplay between transparency and accountability in multilateral climate politics. The 2015 Paris Agreement calls for a “pledge-and-review” approach to collective climate action with an “enhanced transparency framework” as a key pillar of the Agreement. By making visible who is doing what, transparency is widely assumed to be vital to holding countries to account and building trust. We explore whether transparency is generating such effects in this context, by developing and applying an analytical framework to examine the link between transparency and accountability. We find that the scope and practices of climate transparency reflect (rather than necessarily reduce) broader conflicts over who should be held to account to whom and about what, with regard to responsibility and burden sharing for ambitious climate action. We conclude that the relationship between transparency and accountability is less straightforward than assumed, and that the transformative promise of transparency needs to be reconsidered in this light.

AB - This article analyzes the interplay between transparency and accountability in multilateral climate politics. The 2015 Paris Agreement calls for a “pledge-and-review” approach to collective climate action with an “enhanced transparency framework” as a key pillar of the Agreement. By making visible who is doing what, transparency is widely assumed to be vital to holding countries to account and building trust. We explore whether transparency is generating such effects in this context, by developing and applying an analytical framework to examine the link between transparency and accountability. We find that the scope and practices of climate transparency reflect (rather than necessarily reduce) broader conflicts over who should be held to account to whom and about what, with regard to responsibility and burden sharing for ambitious climate action. We conclude that the relationship between transparency and accountability is less straightforward than assumed, and that the transformative promise of transparency needs to be reconsidered in this light.

KW - accountability

KW - climate governance

KW - Paris Agreement

KW - transparency

KW - United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

U2 - 10.1111/rego.12159

DO - 10.1111/rego.12159

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 18

EP - 34

JO - Regulation & Governance

JF - Regulation & Governance

SN - 1748-5983

IS - 1

ER -