Transparency as Contested Political Terrain: Who Knows What about the Global GMO Trade and Why does it Matter?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the prospects for transparency to be a transformative force in global biosafety governance. The global regime governing trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, institutionalizes information disclosure as the central mechanism through which to govern safe transboundary transfers of GMOs. This paper analyses the scope and nature of disclosure obligations relating to GMOs in the bulk agricultural commodity trade, and the implications for the normative, procedural and substantive goals to be accomplished through disclosure. Through analyzing “whose right to know what and why” with regard to the global GMO trade, the paper finds that the limited disclosure currently institutionalized in this regime follows rather than shapes market developments and that complex infrastructures of sampling, testing, detection and verification have to be deployed by information recipients in an attempt to put disclosed information to use to meet desired ends. As a result, in practice, instead of a normative right to know of potential importing countries, a norm of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) prevails instead in global GMO trade. I conclude that the potential of transparency to empower is yet to be realized in this area, particularly for the poorest countries most reliant on globally-induced disclosure
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-52
JournalGlobal Environmental Politics
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

genetically modified organism
transparency
Transparency
biosafety
regime
global governance
commodity
obligation
recipient
market development
infrastructure
market
Sampling
Network protocols
Testing
sampling

Keywords

  • environmental governance
  • information disclosure

Cite this

@article{7fd9e153acbf4e6f878af1958d2e859d,
title = "Transparency as Contested Political Terrain: Who Knows What about the Global GMO Trade and Why does it Matter?",
abstract = "This article explores the prospects for transparency to be a transformative force in global biosafety governance. The global regime governing trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, institutionalizes information disclosure as the central mechanism through which to govern safe transboundary transfers of GMOs. This paper analyses the scope and nature of disclosure obligations relating to GMOs in the bulk agricultural commodity trade, and the implications for the normative, procedural and substantive goals to be accomplished through disclosure. Through analyzing “whose right to know what and why” with regard to the global GMO trade, the paper finds that the limited disclosure currently institutionalized in this regime follows rather than shapes market developments and that complex infrastructures of sampling, testing, detection and verification have to be deployed by information recipients in an attempt to put disclosed information to use to meet desired ends. As a result, in practice, instead of a normative right to know of potential importing countries, a norm of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) prevails instead in global GMO trade. I conclude that the potential of transparency to empower is yet to be realized in this area, particularly for the poorest countries most reliant on globally-induced disclosure",
keywords = "environmental governance, information disclosure",
author = "A. Gupta",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1162/GLEP_a_00013",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "32--52",
journal = "Global Environmental Politics",
issn = "1526-3800",
publisher = "Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press",
number = "3",

}

Transparency as Contested Political Terrain: Who Knows What about the Global GMO Trade and Why does it Matter? / Gupta, A.

In: Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2010, p. 32-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transparency as Contested Political Terrain: Who Knows What about the Global GMO Trade and Why does it Matter?

AU - Gupta, A.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This article explores the prospects for transparency to be a transformative force in global biosafety governance. The global regime governing trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, institutionalizes information disclosure as the central mechanism through which to govern safe transboundary transfers of GMOs. This paper analyses the scope and nature of disclosure obligations relating to GMOs in the bulk agricultural commodity trade, and the implications for the normative, procedural and substantive goals to be accomplished through disclosure. Through analyzing “whose right to know what and why” with regard to the global GMO trade, the paper finds that the limited disclosure currently institutionalized in this regime follows rather than shapes market developments and that complex infrastructures of sampling, testing, detection and verification have to be deployed by information recipients in an attempt to put disclosed information to use to meet desired ends. As a result, in practice, instead of a normative right to know of potential importing countries, a norm of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) prevails instead in global GMO trade. I conclude that the potential of transparency to empower is yet to be realized in this area, particularly for the poorest countries most reliant on globally-induced disclosure

AB - This article explores the prospects for transparency to be a transformative force in global biosafety governance. The global regime governing trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, institutionalizes information disclosure as the central mechanism through which to govern safe transboundary transfers of GMOs. This paper analyses the scope and nature of disclosure obligations relating to GMOs in the bulk agricultural commodity trade, and the implications for the normative, procedural and substantive goals to be accomplished through disclosure. Through analyzing “whose right to know what and why” with regard to the global GMO trade, the paper finds that the limited disclosure currently institutionalized in this regime follows rather than shapes market developments and that complex infrastructures of sampling, testing, detection and verification have to be deployed by information recipients in an attempt to put disclosed information to use to meet desired ends. As a result, in practice, instead of a normative right to know of potential importing countries, a norm of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) prevails instead in global GMO trade. I conclude that the potential of transparency to empower is yet to be realized in this area, particularly for the poorest countries most reliant on globally-induced disclosure

KW - environmental governance

KW - information disclosure

U2 - 10.1162/GLEP_a_00013

DO - 10.1162/GLEP_a_00013

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 32

EP - 52

JO - Global Environmental Politics

JF - Global Environmental Politics

SN - 1526-3800

IS - 3

ER -