Transboundary water interaction III

contest and compliance

Mark Zeitoun*, Ana Elisa Cascão, Jeroen Warner, Naho Mirumachi, Nathanial Matthews, Filippo Menga, Rebecca Farnum

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper serves international water conflict resolution efforts by examining the ways that states contest hegemonic transboundary water arrangements. The conceptual framework of dynamic transboundary water interaction that it presents integrates theories about change and counter-hegemony to ascertain coercive, leverage, and liberating mechanisms through which contest and transformation of an arrangement occur. While the mechanisms can be active through sociopolitical processes either of compliance or of contest of the arrangement, most transboundary water interaction is found to contain elements of both. The role of power asymmetry is interpreted through classification of intervention strategies that seek to either influence or challenge the arrangements. Coexisting contest and compliance serve to explain in part the stasis on the Jordan and Ganges rivers (where the non-hegemons have in effect consented to the arrangement), as well as the changes on the Tigris and Mekong rivers, and even more rapid changes on the Amu Darya and Nile rivers (where the non-hegemons have confronted power asymmetry through influence and challenge). The framework also stresses how transboundary water events that may appear isolated are more accurately read within the many sociopolitical processes and arrangements they are shaped by. By clarifying the typically murky dynamics of interstate relations over transboundary waters, furthermore, the framework exposes a new suite of entry points for hydro-diplomatic initiatives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-294
JournalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

water
interaction
river
asymmetry
Ministry of State Security (GDR)
intervention strategy
conflict resolution
Jordan
hegemony
Contests
Water
Interaction
Transboundary
event
Asymmetry

Keywords

  • Conflict and cooperation
  • Counter-hegemony
  • Hegemony
  • Hydro-hegemony
  • Transboundary water

Cite this

Zeitoun, Mark ; Cascão, Ana Elisa ; Warner, Jeroen ; Mirumachi, Naho ; Matthews, Nathanial ; Menga, Filippo ; Farnum, Rebecca. / Transboundary water interaction III : contest and compliance. In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 271-294.
@article{1bdf0918cdbe4e5fbbcfa8c13b390b5e,
title = "Transboundary water interaction III: contest and compliance",
abstract = "This paper serves international water conflict resolution efforts by examining the ways that states contest hegemonic transboundary water arrangements. The conceptual framework of dynamic transboundary water interaction that it presents integrates theories about change and counter-hegemony to ascertain coercive, leverage, and liberating mechanisms through which contest and transformation of an arrangement occur. While the mechanisms can be active through sociopolitical processes either of compliance or of contest of the arrangement, most transboundary water interaction is found to contain elements of both. The role of power asymmetry is interpreted through classification of intervention strategies that seek to either influence or challenge the arrangements. Coexisting contest and compliance serve to explain in part the stasis on the Jordan and Ganges rivers (where the non-hegemons have in effect consented to the arrangement), as well as the changes on the Tigris and Mekong rivers, and even more rapid changes on the Amu Darya and Nile rivers (where the non-hegemons have confronted power asymmetry through influence and challenge). The framework also stresses how transboundary water events that may appear isolated are more accurately read within the many sociopolitical processes and arrangements they are shaped by. By clarifying the typically murky dynamics of interstate relations over transboundary waters, furthermore, the framework exposes a new suite of entry points for hydro-diplomatic initiatives.",
keywords = "Conflict and cooperation, Counter-hegemony, Hegemony, Hydro-hegemony, Transboundary water",
author = "Mark Zeitoun and Casc{\~a}o, {Ana Elisa} and Jeroen Warner and Naho Mirumachi and Nathanial Matthews and Filippo Menga and Rebecca Farnum",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s10784-016-9325-x",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "271--294",
journal = "International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics",
issn = "1567-9764",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

Transboundary water interaction III : contest and compliance. / Zeitoun, Mark; Cascão, Ana Elisa; Warner, Jeroen; Mirumachi, Naho; Matthews, Nathanial; Menga, Filippo; Farnum, Rebecca.

In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2017, p. 271-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transboundary water interaction III

T2 - contest and compliance

AU - Zeitoun, Mark

AU - Cascão, Ana Elisa

AU - Warner, Jeroen

AU - Mirumachi, Naho

AU - Matthews, Nathanial

AU - Menga, Filippo

AU - Farnum, Rebecca

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This paper serves international water conflict resolution efforts by examining the ways that states contest hegemonic transboundary water arrangements. The conceptual framework of dynamic transboundary water interaction that it presents integrates theories about change and counter-hegemony to ascertain coercive, leverage, and liberating mechanisms through which contest and transformation of an arrangement occur. While the mechanisms can be active through sociopolitical processes either of compliance or of contest of the arrangement, most transboundary water interaction is found to contain elements of both. The role of power asymmetry is interpreted through classification of intervention strategies that seek to either influence or challenge the arrangements. Coexisting contest and compliance serve to explain in part the stasis on the Jordan and Ganges rivers (where the non-hegemons have in effect consented to the arrangement), as well as the changes on the Tigris and Mekong rivers, and even more rapid changes on the Amu Darya and Nile rivers (where the non-hegemons have confronted power asymmetry through influence and challenge). The framework also stresses how transboundary water events that may appear isolated are more accurately read within the many sociopolitical processes and arrangements they are shaped by. By clarifying the typically murky dynamics of interstate relations over transboundary waters, furthermore, the framework exposes a new suite of entry points for hydro-diplomatic initiatives.

AB - This paper serves international water conflict resolution efforts by examining the ways that states contest hegemonic transboundary water arrangements. The conceptual framework of dynamic transboundary water interaction that it presents integrates theories about change and counter-hegemony to ascertain coercive, leverage, and liberating mechanisms through which contest and transformation of an arrangement occur. While the mechanisms can be active through sociopolitical processes either of compliance or of contest of the arrangement, most transboundary water interaction is found to contain elements of both. The role of power asymmetry is interpreted through classification of intervention strategies that seek to either influence or challenge the arrangements. Coexisting contest and compliance serve to explain in part the stasis on the Jordan and Ganges rivers (where the non-hegemons have in effect consented to the arrangement), as well as the changes on the Tigris and Mekong rivers, and even more rapid changes on the Amu Darya and Nile rivers (where the non-hegemons have confronted power asymmetry through influence and challenge). The framework also stresses how transboundary water events that may appear isolated are more accurately read within the many sociopolitical processes and arrangements they are shaped by. By clarifying the typically murky dynamics of interstate relations over transboundary waters, furthermore, the framework exposes a new suite of entry points for hydro-diplomatic initiatives.

KW - Conflict and cooperation

KW - Counter-hegemony

KW - Hegemony

KW - Hydro-hegemony

KW - Transboundary water

U2 - 10.1007/s10784-016-9325-x

DO - 10.1007/s10784-016-9325-x

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 271

EP - 294

JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

SN - 1567-9764

IS - 2

ER -