Abstract
This report draws on a body of existing literature to assess the impact of trade preferences granted by the European Union on trade and welfare in developing countries. It is argued that the Everything But Arms amendment to the EU preference scheme will have limited effect on export potential and welfare in the least developed countries (LDCs). The EU would do well to simplify compliance with their rules of origin. When LDCs are granted deeper preferences under continued domestic agricultural policies in the EU, US, Canada and Japan, resources in LDCs will move towards the agricultural sector. The expected effect impact on LDCs of extending preferences to non-LDCs is quite small, while the negative effect of reductions of MFN tariffs under trade liberalisation is stronger.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Den Haag |
| Publisher | LEI |
| Number of pages | 53 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789052428277 |
| Publication status | Published - 2003 |
Publication series
| Name | Rapport / LEI : Domein 6, Beleid |
|---|---|
| Publisher | LEI |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- agricultural economics
- international trade
- trade preferences
- agricultural policy
- trade liberalization
- european union
- developing countries
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Trade preferences for developing countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver