TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies
T2 - Main concepts, methods and the road ahead
AU - Cord, Anna F.
AU - Bartkowski, Bartosz
AU - Beckmann, Michael
AU - Dittrich, Andreas
AU - Hermans, Kathleen
AU - Kaim, Andrea
AU - Lienhoop, Nele
AU - Locher-Krause, Karla
AU - Priess, Jörg
AU - Schröter-Schlaack, Christoph
AU - Schwarz, Nina
AU - Seppelt, Ralf
AU - Strauch, Michael
AU - Václavík, Tomáš
AU - Volk, Martin
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Ecosystem services (ES), the benefits that humans obtain from nature, are of great importance for human well-being. The challenge of meeting the growing human demands for natural resources while sustaining essential ecosystem functions and resilience requires an in-depth understanding of the complex relationships between ES. These conflicting ('trade-offs') or synergistic ('synergies') relationships mean that changes in one ES can cause changes in other ES. By synthesizing the growing body of literature on ES relationships, we identified the following four main study objectives: (i) the identification and characterization of co-occurrences of ES, (ii) the identification of drivers that shape ES relationships, (iii) the exploration of biophysical constraints of landscapes and limitations to their multifunctionality, and (iv) the support of environmental planning, management and policy decisions. For each of these objectives we here describe the key concepts, including viewpoints of different disciplines, and highlight the major challenges that need to be addressed. We identified three cross-cutting themes being relevant to all four main types of studies. To help guiding researchers towards more systematic analyses of ES trade-offs and synergies, we conclude with an outlook on suggested future research priorities.
AB - Ecosystem services (ES), the benefits that humans obtain from nature, are of great importance for human well-being. The challenge of meeting the growing human demands for natural resources while sustaining essential ecosystem functions and resilience requires an in-depth understanding of the complex relationships between ES. These conflicting ('trade-offs') or synergistic ('synergies') relationships mean that changes in one ES can cause changes in other ES. By synthesizing the growing body of literature on ES relationships, we identified the following four main study objectives: (i) the identification and characterization of co-occurrences of ES, (ii) the identification of drivers that shape ES relationships, (iii) the exploration of biophysical constraints of landscapes and limitations to their multifunctionality, and (iv) the support of environmental planning, management and policy decisions. For each of these objectives we here describe the key concepts, including viewpoints of different disciplines, and highlight the major challenges that need to be addressed. We identified three cross-cutting themes being relevant to all four main types of studies. To help guiding researchers towards more systematic analyses of ES trade-offs and synergies, we conclude with an outlook on suggested future research priorities.
KW - Ecosystem service bundles
KW - Ecosystem service demand
KW - Ecosystem service supply
KW - Optimization
KW - Spatio-temporal scales
KW - Stakeholders
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028082256
SN - 2212-0416
VL - 28
SP - 264
EP - 272
JO - Ecosystem Services
JF - Ecosystem Services
IS - part C
ER -