Towards an anticipatory public engagement methodology: deliberative experiments in the assembly of possible worlds using focus groups

Phil Macnaghten*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Against the background of critique in public engagement scholarship on new and emerging science and innovation, this article engages with the methodological and conceptual challenges of making anticipatory knowledge. Adopting a science and technology studies perspective, a public engagement methodology is presented aimed at anticipating the kinds of possible and plausible worlds that novel science and technology bring into being. Drawing on six empirical social science research projects using focus groups, design criteria are explicated on context, framing, moderation, sampling, analysis and interpretation. A feature of the methodology lies in the assembly of emergent collectives and identities that are constituted to negotiate endogenously public meanings, concerns and priorities. I reflect on the potential of such processes to reconfigure dominant policy narratives, the role of the social scientist in mediating such processes and the politics of making anticipatory knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-19
JournalQualitative Research
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date11 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2021

Keywords

  • anticipatory methodology
  • contextual understanding
  • deliberation
  • endogenous critique
  • focus groups
  • Public engagement with science
  • science and technology studies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Towards an anticipatory public engagement methodology: deliberative experiments in the assembly of possible worlds using focus groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this