Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES.

S. Beck; M. Borie; J. Chilvers; A. Esguerra; K. Heubach; M. Hulme; R. Lidskog; E. Lövbrand; E. Marquard; C. Miller; T. Nadim; C. Neßhöver; J. Settele; E. Turnhout; E. Vasileiadou; C. Görg

doi:10.14512/gaia.23.2.4

Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES.

S. Beck, M. Borie, J. Chilvers, A. Esguerra, K. Heubach, M. Hulme, R. Lidskog, E. Lövbrand, E. Marquard, C. Miller, T. Nadim, C. Neßhöver, J. Settele, E. Turnhout, E. Vasileiadou, C. Görg

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

204 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The role and design of global expert organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) needs rethinking. Acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all model does not exist, we suggest a reflexive turn that implies treating the governance of expertise as a matter of political contestation.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	80-87
Journal	Gaia
Volume	23
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.2.4
Publication status	Published - 2014

Keywords

science-policy interface
biodiversity
assessments

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.14512/gaia.23.2.4

Cite this

Beck, S., Borie, M., Chilvers, J., Esguerra, A., Heubach, K., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., Lövbrand, E., Marquard, E., Miller, C., Nadim, T., Neßhöver, C., Settele, J., Turnhout, E., Vasileiadou, E., & Görg, C. (2014). Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. Gaia, 23(2), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.2.4

@article{e5fb756b37b94d6ab5e822df7399b4b7,

title = "Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES.",

abstract = "The role and design of global expert organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) needs rethinking. Acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all model does not exist, we suggest a reflexive turn that implies treating the governance of expertise as a matter of political contestation.",

keywords = "science-policy interface, biodiversity, assessments",

author = "S. Beck and M. Borie and J. Chilvers and A. Esguerra and K. Heubach and M. Hulme and R. Lidskog and E. L{\"o}vbrand and E. Marquard and C. Miller and T. Nadim and C. Ne{\ss}h{\"o}ver and J. Settele and E. Turnhout and E. Vasileiadou and C. G{\"o}rg",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.14512/gaia.23.2.4",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "80--87",

journal = "Gaia",

issn = "0940-5550",

publisher = "Oekom Verlag",

number = "2",

}

Beck, S, Borie, M, Chilvers, J, Esguerra, A, Heubach, K, Hulme, M, Lidskog, R, Lövbrand, E, Marquard, E, Miller, C, Nadim, T, Neßhöver, C, Settele, J, Turnhout, E, Vasileiadou, E & Görg, C 2014, 'Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES.', Gaia, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 80-87. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.2.4

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES.

AU - Beck, S.

AU - Borie, M.

AU - Chilvers, J.

AU - Esguerra, A.

AU - Heubach, K.

AU - Hulme, M.

AU - Lidskog, R.

AU - Lövbrand, E.

AU - Marquard, E.

AU - Miller, C.

AU - Nadim, T.

AU - Neßhöver, C.

AU - Settele, J.

AU - Turnhout, E.

AU - Vasileiadou, E.

AU - Görg, C.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The role and design of global expert organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) needs rethinking. Acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all model does not exist, we suggest a reflexive turn that implies treating the governance of expertise as a matter of political contestation.

AB - The role and design of global expert organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) needs rethinking. Acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all model does not exist, we suggest a reflexive turn that implies treating the governance of expertise as a matter of political contestation.

KW - science-policy interface

KW - biodiversity

KW - assessments

U2 - 10.14512/gaia.23.2.4

DO - 10.14512/gaia.23.2.4

M3 - Article

SN - 0940-5550

VL - 23

SP - 80

EP - 87

JO - Gaia

JF - Gaia

IS - 2

ER -

Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES.

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this