Abstract
This paper investigates the fundamental idea at stake in current bioeconomies such as Europe’s Bio-Based Economy (BBE). We argue that basing an economy upon ecology is an ambivalent effort, causing confusion and inconsistencies, and that the dominant framing of the damaged biosphere as a market-failure in bioeconomies such as the BBE is problematic. To counter this dominant narrative, we present alternative conceptualisations of bio-economies and indicate which concepts are overlooked. We highlight the specific contradictions and discrepancies in the relation between economy and ecology, and then work towards outlining a genuine and consistent conceptualisation of the BBE. The philosophical perspective of Emmanuel Levinas is employed to develop a more profound understanding of the tensions at stake; Levinas’ work is compared with that of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen’s work on bioeconomics, and found to be of complementary value. Our hypothesis is that, rather than the impossible, absolute amalgamation of economy and ecology striven for today, a principal heterogeneity between humankind and nature must be acknowledged if a bioeconomy that truly operates within the carrying capacity of planet Earth is to be achieved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 169-192 |
Journal | Environmental Values |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 18 Aug 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2021 |
Keywords
- Bio-based economy
- Circular economy
- Enjoyment
- Georgescu-Roegen
- Levinas
- Sustainability