Towards a comprehensive methodology for ecotoxicological assessment: Prioritizing plant protection products for mixture testing in edge-of-field surface waterbodies

Nelson Abrantes*, Joana Luísa Pereira, Ana Belén Muñiz González, Isabel Campos, Irene Navarro, Adrián de la Torre, María Ángeles Martínez, Rima Osman, Chrow Khurshid, Paula Harkes, Esperanza Huerta Lwanga, Francisco Alcon, Josefa Contreras, Isabelle Baldi, Mathilde Bureau, Abdallah Alaoui, Florian Christ, Daniele Mandrioli, Daria Sgargi, Igor PaskovićMarija Polić Pasković, Matjaž Glavan, Jakub Hofman, Trine Norgaard, Virginia Aparicio, Vera Silva

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pesticide applications in agriculture result in complex mixtures of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) in the environment. The ecotoxicological effects of these mixtures can occur at concentrations considered safe for individual chemicals, indicating potential risks underestimated by current regulatory assessments focused on individual active ingredients. To address this challenge, our study introduces a methodology for identifying priority PPPs for formulating mixtures, enabling further ecotoxicological testing in water and sediment compartments of edge-of-field surface water bodies, targeting pelagic and benthic organisms. This methodology was primarily based on the actual quantification of PPPs present in these compartments from selected case study sites (CSSs) in Europe and Argentina (11 and 4 for water and sediments, respectively). A conceptual framework was developed that discriminates and selects concerning PPPs based on their individual risk quotient and frequency of occurrence in each CSS, drawing upon two EU regulatory risk assessment approaches, i.e., the general approach under REACH for any environmental contaminant of concern – the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) approach; and that specifically focusing on PPPs – the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) approach. Irrespective of whether the focus is on water or sediments, the study revealed disparities in PPP rankings depending on the approach used to identify PPPs of concern, with the ECHA approach being more conservative than the EFSA approach. Despite this, the EFSA approach follows a more standardized assessment factor definition strategy, potentially allowing avoidance of risk overestimation, as well as resulting in a more balanced representation of different PPP classes for subsequent mixtures testing. Overall, the methodological development reported herein, along with the inconsistencies found when comparing different regulatory approaches to assess the risk of environmental contaminants, highlight the need for further discussion on the most appropriate directions towards the standardization of the regulatory risk assessment of PPP mixtures.

Original languageEnglish
Article number177322
Number of pages13
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume956
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Freshwater
  • Mixtures
  • Pesticides
  • Risk assessment
  • Risk quotient

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a comprehensive methodology for ecotoxicological assessment: Prioritizing plant protection products for mixture testing in edge-of-field surface waterbodies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this