Toward a direct comparison of field and laboratory goniometer measurements

S. Dangel, M. Verstraete, J. Schopfer, M. Kneubuehler, M.E. Schaepman, K.I. Itten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Field and laboratory goniometers are widely used in the remote sensing community to assess spectrodirectional reflection properties of selected targets. Even when the same target and goniometer system are used, field and laboratory results cannot directly be compared due to inherent differences, mainly in the illumination conditions since actual goniometers measure a hemispherical-conical reflectance in the field and a biconical reflectance in the lab. Yet, the ability to compare and combine measurements from different instrumental designs is critical to ensure sensor cross-calibration and for all applications that rely on measurements obtained with both types of instruments. One approach to this problem consists in retrieving the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) of the targets of interest for each experimental setup and to compare these, since theoretically they are independent of the particular conditions of illumination and observation. This involves a correction for diffuse incoming radiation in the case of field measurements, and a correction for conicity and inhomogeneity of illumination in the case of laboratory measurements. In this paper, we present a novel BRDF retrieval scheme for typical laboratory goniometers and compare it with the usual correction method assuming Lambertian behavior. We then discuss the first results of measurements and BRDF retrievals using the field and laboratory goniometer systems of the Remote Sensing Laboratories of the University of Zurich, which share the exact observation geometry, on the same inert, highly anisotropic target
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2666-2675
JournalIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Goniometers
bidirectional reflectance
Distribution functions
Lighting
Remote sensing
reflectance
remote sensing
inhomogeneity
comparison
laboratory
Calibration
sensor
calibration
Radiation
geometry
Geometry
Sensors
distribution

Keywords

  • bidirectional reflectance
  • acquisition
  • calibration

Cite this

Dangel, S., Verstraete, M., Schopfer, J., Kneubuehler, M., Schaepman, M. E., & Itten, K. I. (2005). Toward a direct comparison of field and laboratory goniometer measurements. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(11), 2666-2675. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.857324
Dangel, S. ; Verstraete, M. ; Schopfer, J. ; Kneubuehler, M. ; Schaepman, M.E. ; Itten, K.I. / Toward a direct comparison of field and laboratory goniometer measurements. In: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2005 ; Vol. 43, No. 11. pp. 2666-2675.
@article{c17a56943a1644c485ed64eb435433b3,
title = "Toward a direct comparison of field and laboratory goniometer measurements",
abstract = "Field and laboratory goniometers are widely used in the remote sensing community to assess spectrodirectional reflection properties of selected targets. Even when the same target and goniometer system are used, field and laboratory results cannot directly be compared due to inherent differences, mainly in the illumination conditions since actual goniometers measure a hemispherical-conical reflectance in the field and a biconical reflectance in the lab. Yet, the ability to compare and combine measurements from different instrumental designs is critical to ensure sensor cross-calibration and for all applications that rely on measurements obtained with both types of instruments. One approach to this problem consists in retrieving the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) of the targets of interest for each experimental setup and to compare these, since theoretically they are independent of the particular conditions of illumination and observation. This involves a correction for diffuse incoming radiation in the case of field measurements, and a correction for conicity and inhomogeneity of illumination in the case of laboratory measurements. In this paper, we present a novel BRDF retrieval scheme for typical laboratory goniometers and compare it with the usual correction method assuming Lambertian behavior. We then discuss the first results of measurements and BRDF retrievals using the field and laboratory goniometer systems of the Remote Sensing Laboratories of the University of Zurich, which share the exact observation geometry, on the same inert, highly anisotropic target",
keywords = "bidirectional reflectance, acquisition, calibration",
author = "S. Dangel and M. Verstraete and J. Schopfer and M. Kneubuehler and M.E. Schaepman and K.I. Itten",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1109/TGRS.2005.857324",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "2666--2675",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing",
issn = "0196-2892",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers",
number = "11",

}

Dangel, S, Verstraete, M, Schopfer, J, Kneubuehler, M, Schaepman, ME & Itten, KI 2005, 'Toward a direct comparison of field and laboratory goniometer measurements', IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2666-2675. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.857324

Toward a direct comparison of field and laboratory goniometer measurements. / Dangel, S.; Verstraete, M.; Schopfer, J.; Kneubuehler, M.; Schaepman, M.E.; Itten, K.I.

In: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 43, No. 11, 2005, p. 2666-2675.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a direct comparison of field and laboratory goniometer measurements

AU - Dangel, S.

AU - Verstraete, M.

AU - Schopfer, J.

AU - Kneubuehler, M.

AU - Schaepman, M.E.

AU - Itten, K.I.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Field and laboratory goniometers are widely used in the remote sensing community to assess spectrodirectional reflection properties of selected targets. Even when the same target and goniometer system are used, field and laboratory results cannot directly be compared due to inherent differences, mainly in the illumination conditions since actual goniometers measure a hemispherical-conical reflectance in the field and a biconical reflectance in the lab. Yet, the ability to compare and combine measurements from different instrumental designs is critical to ensure sensor cross-calibration and for all applications that rely on measurements obtained with both types of instruments. One approach to this problem consists in retrieving the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) of the targets of interest for each experimental setup and to compare these, since theoretically they are independent of the particular conditions of illumination and observation. This involves a correction for diffuse incoming radiation in the case of field measurements, and a correction for conicity and inhomogeneity of illumination in the case of laboratory measurements. In this paper, we present a novel BRDF retrieval scheme for typical laboratory goniometers and compare it with the usual correction method assuming Lambertian behavior. We then discuss the first results of measurements and BRDF retrievals using the field and laboratory goniometer systems of the Remote Sensing Laboratories of the University of Zurich, which share the exact observation geometry, on the same inert, highly anisotropic target

AB - Field and laboratory goniometers are widely used in the remote sensing community to assess spectrodirectional reflection properties of selected targets. Even when the same target and goniometer system are used, field and laboratory results cannot directly be compared due to inherent differences, mainly in the illumination conditions since actual goniometers measure a hemispherical-conical reflectance in the field and a biconical reflectance in the lab. Yet, the ability to compare and combine measurements from different instrumental designs is critical to ensure sensor cross-calibration and for all applications that rely on measurements obtained with both types of instruments. One approach to this problem consists in retrieving the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) of the targets of interest for each experimental setup and to compare these, since theoretically they are independent of the particular conditions of illumination and observation. This involves a correction for diffuse incoming radiation in the case of field measurements, and a correction for conicity and inhomogeneity of illumination in the case of laboratory measurements. In this paper, we present a novel BRDF retrieval scheme for typical laboratory goniometers and compare it with the usual correction method assuming Lambertian behavior. We then discuss the first results of measurements and BRDF retrievals using the field and laboratory goniometer systems of the Remote Sensing Laboratories of the University of Zurich, which share the exact observation geometry, on the same inert, highly anisotropic target

KW - bidirectional reflectance

KW - acquisition

KW - calibration

U2 - 10.1109/TGRS.2005.857324

DO - 10.1109/TGRS.2005.857324

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 2666

EP - 2675

JO - IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

JF - IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

SN - 0196-2892

IS - 11

ER -