Topical themes in biodiversity financing

Nowella Anyango-van Zwieten*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

One of the often-cited challenges in biodiversity conservation is financing. But publications on financing are mostly confined to specific financial mechanisms, regions and actors. Fewer attempts have been made to find overall trends. Through a thematic review of 64 peer-reviewed articles, covering different disciplines and published since 2010, this study found three dominant themes recurring around the topic of biodiversity financing: underfunding, inefficient funding distribution and the pursuit for innovative financial mechanisms. Estimates of the funding gap are much higher than previously calculated and continuously increasing given the acceleration of new threats. Proposals for better targeting of available finances advocate for the use of priority protocols focussed on objectivity and efficiency. However, in practice funding allocation does not seem to follow objective indicators and remains quite inconsistent with conservation needs. This analysis shows that at the core of innovative financial mechanisms are new strategic networks between governments, civil society and businesses. Understanding these new networks is crucial for better capturing the patterns of pooling, mixing and directing financial flows, and the subsequent implications for policy and prioritization criteria. This paper argues that theories focusing on networks and flows could present a useful perspective for future studies on biodiversity financing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-35
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of integrative Environmental Sciences
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Biodiversity finance
  • conservation finance
  • conservation networks
  • funding gap
  • innovative financial mechanisms
  • underfunding

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Topical themes in biodiversity financing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this