Three archetypical governance pathways for transformative change toward sustainability

Katrien Termeer*, Art Dewulf, Robbert Biesbroek

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Choosing successful governance strategies for transformative change toward sustainability is critical. However, the multitude of approaches is overwhelming. This article identifies three underlying key dimensions of transformative change: in depth, system-wide, and quick. We content that these cannot be achieved simultaneously due to trade-offs. This provides the starting point for conceptualizing three more realistic archetypical governance pathways. They all start with strategies representing two of the three dimensions, while the third follows: (1) Big Plans start with deep and system-wide change (e.g. large-scale flood protection), (2) Small Wins with deep and quick change (e.g. community-based conservation), and (3) Rule Changes with system-wide and quick change (e.g. the EU Emissions Trading System). Choices depend on the societal context and governance capabilities.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101479
JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Volume71
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Three archetypical governance pathways for transformative change toward sustainability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this