Thirty years of systematic land evaluation in the Netherlands

M.P.W. Sonneveld, M.J.D. Hack-ten Broeke, C.A. van Diepen, H.L. Boogaard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thirty years ago, the third version of the land evaluation procedure by the Dutch Working Group for the Interpretation of Soil Maps (WIB-C) was published. This allowed for the first time a systematic approach for the evaluation of land units. Previous procedures in The Netherlands were dependent on empirical knowledge and were not flexible. The WIB-C procedure was developed for planning purposes on a regional level and resembled the qualitative physical approach of the FAO land evaluation framework. This paper documents the main elements of the WIB-C procedure and describes its continued use and development over the past three decades. In time, serious questions about the procedure were being raised. Specifically, it appeared that: i) there was an increasing need for more quantitative approaches in combination with simulation models, ii) there was a need to differentiate between scales, iii) environmental aspects needed to be taken into account and iv) the dynamic nature of soils in relation to land use required more dynamic representations of soil processes. The conversion of the WIB-C procedure into an automated GIS environment greatly enhanced the flexibility of the procedure and allowed stakeholders to provide input into the procedure. Currently, parts of the procedure are still successfully being implemented in studies at sub-regional and regional level. At national and European level, approaches similar to WIB-C are useful for ranking soils and identifying areas that are at risk for a certain threat to the soil. New definitions of multifunctional land utilization types where different spatial functions are jointly evaluated have not yet been fully developed but will be needed in the future because of their role in current national and European policies. This also relates to the EU Soil Protection Strategy where a new array of soil functions is being distinguished. The application domain of land evaluation procedures has nowadays been broadened from land use and land allocation to optimum sustainable resource use, and from land use planning to environmental impact assessments and risk assessments, from one-time assessments to continuous monitoring of environmental changes, and to analysis of past trends and future projections, as in scenario studies. It is in this whole new field of interdisciplinary applications that the kind of interpretation procedures as developed originally for land evaluation can make a contribution.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-92
JournalGeoderma
Volume156
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

land evaluation
Netherlands
soil
land use
Food and Agricultural Organization
environmental impact assessment
land use planning
resource use
ranking
environmental change
stakeholder
risk assessment
environmental monitoring
GIS
environmental assessment
stakeholders
simulation models
monitoring
planning
simulation

Keywords

  • land evaluation
  • soil
  • maps
  • mapping
  • netherlands
  • moisture supply capacity
  • soil survey
  • use history
  • science
  • simulation
  • management
  • communities

Cite this

Sonneveld, M.P.W. ; Hack-ten Broeke, M.J.D. ; van Diepen, C.A. ; Boogaard, H.L. / Thirty years of systematic land evaluation in the Netherlands. In: Geoderma. 2010 ; Vol. 156, No. 3-4. pp. 84-92.
@article{994a40b5eff6437fb1e68c4c7621f94d,
title = "Thirty years of systematic land evaluation in the Netherlands",
abstract = "Thirty years ago, the third version of the land evaluation procedure by the Dutch Working Group for the Interpretation of Soil Maps (WIB-C) was published. This allowed for the first time a systematic approach for the evaluation of land units. Previous procedures in The Netherlands were dependent on empirical knowledge and were not flexible. The WIB-C procedure was developed for planning purposes on a regional level and resembled the qualitative physical approach of the FAO land evaluation framework. This paper documents the main elements of the WIB-C procedure and describes its continued use and development over the past three decades. In time, serious questions about the procedure were being raised. Specifically, it appeared that: i) there was an increasing need for more quantitative approaches in combination with simulation models, ii) there was a need to differentiate between scales, iii) environmental aspects needed to be taken into account and iv) the dynamic nature of soils in relation to land use required more dynamic representations of soil processes. The conversion of the WIB-C procedure into an automated GIS environment greatly enhanced the flexibility of the procedure and allowed stakeholders to provide input into the procedure. Currently, parts of the procedure are still successfully being implemented in studies at sub-regional and regional level. At national and European level, approaches similar to WIB-C are useful for ranking soils and identifying areas that are at risk for a certain threat to the soil. New definitions of multifunctional land utilization types where different spatial functions are jointly evaluated have not yet been fully developed but will be needed in the future because of their role in current national and European policies. This also relates to the EU Soil Protection Strategy where a new array of soil functions is being distinguished. The application domain of land evaluation procedures has nowadays been broadened from land use and land allocation to optimum sustainable resource use, and from land use planning to environmental impact assessments and risk assessments, from one-time assessments to continuous monitoring of environmental changes, and to analysis of past trends and future projections, as in scenario studies. It is in this whole new field of interdisciplinary applications that the kind of interpretation procedures as developed originally for land evaluation can make a contribution.",
keywords = "landevaluatie, bodem, kaarten, cartografie, nederland, land evaluation, soil, maps, mapping, netherlands, moisture supply capacity, soil survey, use history, science, simulation, management, communities",
author = "M.P.W. Sonneveld and {Hack-ten Broeke}, M.J.D. and {van Diepen}, C.A. and H.L. Boogaard",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.023",
language = "English",
volume = "156",
pages = "84--92",
journal = "Geoderma",
issn = "0016-7061",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3-4",

}

Thirty years of systematic land evaluation in the Netherlands. / Sonneveld, M.P.W.; Hack-ten Broeke, M.J.D.; van Diepen, C.A.; Boogaard, H.L.

In: Geoderma, Vol. 156, No. 3-4, 2010, p. 84-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thirty years of systematic land evaluation in the Netherlands

AU - Sonneveld, M.P.W.

AU - Hack-ten Broeke, M.J.D.

AU - van Diepen, C.A.

AU - Boogaard, H.L.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Thirty years ago, the third version of the land evaluation procedure by the Dutch Working Group for the Interpretation of Soil Maps (WIB-C) was published. This allowed for the first time a systematic approach for the evaluation of land units. Previous procedures in The Netherlands were dependent on empirical knowledge and were not flexible. The WIB-C procedure was developed for planning purposes on a regional level and resembled the qualitative physical approach of the FAO land evaluation framework. This paper documents the main elements of the WIB-C procedure and describes its continued use and development over the past three decades. In time, serious questions about the procedure were being raised. Specifically, it appeared that: i) there was an increasing need for more quantitative approaches in combination with simulation models, ii) there was a need to differentiate between scales, iii) environmental aspects needed to be taken into account and iv) the dynamic nature of soils in relation to land use required more dynamic representations of soil processes. The conversion of the WIB-C procedure into an automated GIS environment greatly enhanced the flexibility of the procedure and allowed stakeholders to provide input into the procedure. Currently, parts of the procedure are still successfully being implemented in studies at sub-regional and regional level. At national and European level, approaches similar to WIB-C are useful for ranking soils and identifying areas that are at risk for a certain threat to the soil. New definitions of multifunctional land utilization types where different spatial functions are jointly evaluated have not yet been fully developed but will be needed in the future because of their role in current national and European policies. This also relates to the EU Soil Protection Strategy where a new array of soil functions is being distinguished. The application domain of land evaluation procedures has nowadays been broadened from land use and land allocation to optimum sustainable resource use, and from land use planning to environmental impact assessments and risk assessments, from one-time assessments to continuous monitoring of environmental changes, and to analysis of past trends and future projections, as in scenario studies. It is in this whole new field of interdisciplinary applications that the kind of interpretation procedures as developed originally for land evaluation can make a contribution.

AB - Thirty years ago, the third version of the land evaluation procedure by the Dutch Working Group for the Interpretation of Soil Maps (WIB-C) was published. This allowed for the first time a systematic approach for the evaluation of land units. Previous procedures in The Netherlands were dependent on empirical knowledge and were not flexible. The WIB-C procedure was developed for planning purposes on a regional level and resembled the qualitative physical approach of the FAO land evaluation framework. This paper documents the main elements of the WIB-C procedure and describes its continued use and development over the past three decades. In time, serious questions about the procedure were being raised. Specifically, it appeared that: i) there was an increasing need for more quantitative approaches in combination with simulation models, ii) there was a need to differentiate between scales, iii) environmental aspects needed to be taken into account and iv) the dynamic nature of soils in relation to land use required more dynamic representations of soil processes. The conversion of the WIB-C procedure into an automated GIS environment greatly enhanced the flexibility of the procedure and allowed stakeholders to provide input into the procedure. Currently, parts of the procedure are still successfully being implemented in studies at sub-regional and regional level. At national and European level, approaches similar to WIB-C are useful for ranking soils and identifying areas that are at risk for a certain threat to the soil. New definitions of multifunctional land utilization types where different spatial functions are jointly evaluated have not yet been fully developed but will be needed in the future because of their role in current national and European policies. This also relates to the EU Soil Protection Strategy where a new array of soil functions is being distinguished. The application domain of land evaluation procedures has nowadays been broadened from land use and land allocation to optimum sustainable resource use, and from land use planning to environmental impact assessments and risk assessments, from one-time assessments to continuous monitoring of environmental changes, and to analysis of past trends and future projections, as in scenario studies. It is in this whole new field of interdisciplinary applications that the kind of interpretation procedures as developed originally for land evaluation can make a contribution.

KW - landevaluatie

KW - bodem

KW - kaarten

KW - cartografie

KW - nederland

KW - land evaluation

KW - soil

KW - maps

KW - mapping

KW - netherlands

KW - moisture supply capacity

KW - soil survey

KW - use history

KW - science

KW - simulation

KW - management

KW - communities

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.023

DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.023

M3 - Article

VL - 156

SP - 84

EP - 92

JO - Geoderma

JF - Geoderma

SN - 0016-7061

IS - 3-4

ER -