The value of tropical forest to local communities: Complications, caveats, and cautions

Douglas Sheil, Sven Wunder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

110 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The methods used to value tropical forests have the potential to influence how policy makers and others perceive forest lands. A small number of valuation studies achieve real impact. These are generally succinct accounts supporting a specific perception. However, such reports risk being used to justify inappropriate actions. The end users of such results are rarely those who produced them, and misunderstanding of key details is a concern. One defense is to ensure that shortcomings and common pitfalls are better appreciated by the ultimate users. In this article, we aim to reduce such risks by discussing how valuation studies should be assessed and challenged by users. We consider two concise, high-profile valuation papers here, by Peters and colleagues and by Godoy and colleagues. We illustrate a series of questions that should be asked, not only about the two papers, but also about any landscape valuation study. We highlight the many challenges faced in valuing tropical forest lands and in presenting and using the results sensibly, and we offer some suggestions for improvement. Attention to complexities and clarity about uncertainties are required. Forest valuation must be pursued and promoted with caution.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEcology and Society
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The value of tropical forest to local communities: Complications, caveats, and cautions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this