Abstract
This paper draws on the case of Dutch regional planning in the 1950s to investigate
how ‘urban space’ and ‘rural space’ have traditionally been perceived as opposing concepts.
During this decade, politicians, planners and policy-makers constructed an image of an
overdeveloped, urban, industrial centre on the one hand, and an underdeveloped, rural,
agricultural periphery on the other. Rooted in a debate about the ‘harmonious’ development of
the Netherlands, this image made a substantial contribution to the schematic understanding of
urban and rural space. Examining this frame as an historical construct helps to reveal the
anachronistic character of many of the urban-rural differentiations that are made today.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 437-450 |
Journal | Landscape Research |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- space