The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education

Omid Noroozi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Students’ argumentation performance can be influenced by their epistemic beliefs, however, in the context of argumentative essay writing and argumentative peer feedback in online setting this has not been clearly investigated. This study explores relationship between students’ epistemic beliefs and argumentation performance regarding essay writing and peer feedback. In total, 101 undergraduate students filled out the epistemic beliefs survey and wrote an argumentative essay. Then, they provided two sets of feedback on the essays of their peers and finally submitted their revised essays. Students’ beliefs about the Internet-specific justification of knowledge did not play a significant role in their argumentation performance in essay writing, while it was related to their constructive peer feedback performance. Students’ beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge were significantly related to their argumentative essay writing and peer feedback performance. In terms of uptake of peer feedback, no significant role was found for epistemic beliefs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)501-512
JournalInnovations in Education and Teaching International
Volume60
Issue number4
Early online date2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Argumentation performance
  • argumentative essay writing
  • argumentative peer feedback
  • epistemic beliefs
  • higher education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this