The role of measurement problems and monitoring in PES schemes

G.W. Meijerink

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Payment for environmental services (PES) is seen as a mechanism that can achieve two goals, providing poor resource managers with an additional source of income and maintaining environmental services. Although some reservations have been made on the effectiveness of PES of reaching the poor, similar reservations can be made about achieving the second goal. Because many environmental services are intangible, developing simple and straightforward indicators to measure and monitor the environmental service provided and linking these to the efforts supplied by the resource managers is difficult and costly. But establishing this link is crucial to those who are paying and ultimately for the success of the PES concept. By reviewing the literature on this topic and analysing in a systematic way what types of measurement problems there are, we will show that the type of monitoring that is required within a PES has consequences for the institutional arrangement needed for a successful PES. We find that the institutional arrangements for monitoring vary according to (i) the type of environmental service and its underlying production process; (ii) the extent to which the environmental service can be freely observed or measured; (iii) the extent to which activities of the resource managers who provide the environmental service can be freely observed; and finally (iv) the deterministic or stochastic nature of production processes
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationEconomics of Poverty, Environment and Natural-Resource Use
    EditorsR.B. Dellink, A. Ruijs
    Place of PublicationWageningen
    Pages61-85
    Number of pages218
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Publication series

    NameWageningen UR Frontis Series
    PublisherFrontis
    Number25

    Fingerprint

    Payments for environmental services
    Monitoring
    Environmental services
    Resources
    Managers
    Production process
    Reservation
    Institutional arrangements
    Intangibles
    Reviewing
    Income

    Cite this

    Meijerink, G. W. (2008). The role of measurement problems and monitoring in PES schemes. In R. B. Dellink, & A. Ruijs (Eds.), Economics of Poverty, Environment and Natural-Resource Use (pp. 61-85). (Wageningen UR Frontis Series; No. 25). Wageningen.
    Meijerink, G.W. / The role of measurement problems and monitoring in PES schemes. Economics of Poverty, Environment and Natural-Resource Use. editor / R.B. Dellink ; A. Ruijs. Wageningen, 2008. pp. 61-85 (Wageningen UR Frontis Series; 25).
    @inbook{bb6bc343c7604cdd99cb89cf4d8b996b,
    title = "The role of measurement problems and monitoring in PES schemes",
    abstract = "Payment for environmental services (PES) is seen as a mechanism that can achieve two goals, providing poor resource managers with an additional source of income and maintaining environmental services. Although some reservations have been made on the effectiveness of PES of reaching the poor, similar reservations can be made about achieving the second goal. Because many environmental services are intangible, developing simple and straightforward indicators to measure and monitor the environmental service provided and linking these to the efforts supplied by the resource managers is difficult and costly. But establishing this link is crucial to those who are paying and ultimately for the success of the PES concept. By reviewing the literature on this topic and analysing in a systematic way what types of measurement problems there are, we will show that the type of monitoring that is required within a PES has consequences for the institutional arrangement needed for a successful PES. We find that the institutional arrangements for monitoring vary according to (i) the type of environmental service and its underlying production process; (ii) the extent to which the environmental service can be freely observed or measured; (iii) the extent to which activities of the resource managers who provide the environmental service can be freely observed; and finally (iv) the deterministic or stochastic nature of production processes",
    author = "G.W. Meijerink",
    year = "2008",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781402083037",
    series = "Wageningen UR Frontis Series",
    publisher = "Frontis",
    number = "25",
    pages = "61--85",
    editor = "R.B. Dellink and A. Ruijs",
    booktitle = "Economics of Poverty, Environment and Natural-Resource Use",

    }

    Meijerink, GW 2008, The role of measurement problems and monitoring in PES schemes. in RB Dellink & A Ruijs (eds), Economics of Poverty, Environment and Natural-Resource Use. Wageningen UR Frontis Series, no. 25, Wageningen, pp. 61-85.

    The role of measurement problems and monitoring in PES schemes. / Meijerink, G.W.

    Economics of Poverty, Environment and Natural-Resource Use. ed. / R.B. Dellink; A. Ruijs. Wageningen, 2008. p. 61-85 (Wageningen UR Frontis Series; No. 25).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - The role of measurement problems and monitoring in PES schemes

    AU - Meijerink, G.W.

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - Payment for environmental services (PES) is seen as a mechanism that can achieve two goals, providing poor resource managers with an additional source of income and maintaining environmental services. Although some reservations have been made on the effectiveness of PES of reaching the poor, similar reservations can be made about achieving the second goal. Because many environmental services are intangible, developing simple and straightforward indicators to measure and monitor the environmental service provided and linking these to the efforts supplied by the resource managers is difficult and costly. But establishing this link is crucial to those who are paying and ultimately for the success of the PES concept. By reviewing the literature on this topic and analysing in a systematic way what types of measurement problems there are, we will show that the type of monitoring that is required within a PES has consequences for the institutional arrangement needed for a successful PES. We find that the institutional arrangements for monitoring vary according to (i) the type of environmental service and its underlying production process; (ii) the extent to which the environmental service can be freely observed or measured; (iii) the extent to which activities of the resource managers who provide the environmental service can be freely observed; and finally (iv) the deterministic or stochastic nature of production processes

    AB - Payment for environmental services (PES) is seen as a mechanism that can achieve two goals, providing poor resource managers with an additional source of income and maintaining environmental services. Although some reservations have been made on the effectiveness of PES of reaching the poor, similar reservations can be made about achieving the second goal. Because many environmental services are intangible, developing simple and straightforward indicators to measure and monitor the environmental service provided and linking these to the efforts supplied by the resource managers is difficult and costly. But establishing this link is crucial to those who are paying and ultimately for the success of the PES concept. By reviewing the literature on this topic and analysing in a systematic way what types of measurement problems there are, we will show that the type of monitoring that is required within a PES has consequences for the institutional arrangement needed for a successful PES. We find that the institutional arrangements for monitoring vary according to (i) the type of environmental service and its underlying production process; (ii) the extent to which the environmental service can be freely observed or measured; (iii) the extent to which activities of the resource managers who provide the environmental service can be freely observed; and finally (iv) the deterministic or stochastic nature of production processes

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9781402083037

    T3 - Wageningen UR Frontis Series

    SP - 61

    EP - 85

    BT - Economics of Poverty, Environment and Natural-Resource Use

    A2 - Dellink, R.B.

    A2 - Ruijs, A.

    CY - Wageningen

    ER -

    Meijerink GW. The role of measurement problems and monitoring in PES schemes. In Dellink RB, Ruijs A, editors, Economics of Poverty, Environment and Natural-Resource Use. Wageningen. 2008. p. 61-85. (Wageningen UR Frontis Series; 25).