The qualified presumption of safety assessment and its role in EFSA risk evaluations: 15 years past

Lieve Herman, Marianne Chemaly, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Pablo Fernandez, Günter Klein, Luisa Peixe, Miguel Prieto, Amparo Querol, Juan Evaristo Suarez, Ingvar Sundh, Just Vlak, Sandra Correia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Microorganisms are intentionally added at different stages of the food and feed chain (food or feed additive, novel food or plant protection product) and are subjected to regulation and safety assessment by the European Food Safety Authority. Safety evaluation is based on application dossiers for market authorisation to the European Commission. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) concept was developed in 20031 to provide a harmonised generic safety pre-appraisal of the above microorganisms. Unambiguously defined biological taxonomic units (TUs) are assessed for their body of knowledge, their safety and their end use. Identified safety concerns for a certain TU can be, where reasonable in number and not universally present, reflected as 'qualifications.' Strains belonging to TUs having QPS status may benefit of a fast track evaluation. The lowest TU for which the QPS status is granted is the species level for bacteria and yeasts and the family for viruses. The QPS concept is also applicable to genetically modified microorganisms used for production purposes. Based on the current body of knowledge and/or the ambiguous taxonomic position, some TUs, such as filamentous fungi, bacteriophages, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Streptomyces spp. and Oomycetes, are not considered liable for QPS status.

LanguageEnglish
JournalFEMS Microbiology Letters
Volume366
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Safety
Inovirus
Oomycetes
Enterococcus faecium
Edible Plants
Food Chain
Food Safety
Streptomyces
Fungi
Yeasts
Escherichia coli
Viruses
Bacteria
Food

Cite this

Herman, L., Chemaly, M., Cocconcelli, P. S., Fernandez, P., Klein, G., Peixe, L., ... Correia, S. (2018). The qualified presumption of safety assessment and its role in EFSA risk evaluations: 15 years past. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 366(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny260
Herman, Lieve ; Chemaly, Marianne ; Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro ; Fernandez, Pablo ; Klein, Günter ; Peixe, Luisa ; Prieto, Miguel ; Querol, Amparo ; Suarez, Juan Evaristo ; Sundh, Ingvar ; Vlak, Just ; Correia, Sandra. / The qualified presumption of safety assessment and its role in EFSA risk evaluations : 15 years past. In: FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2018 ; Vol. 366, No. 1.
@article{01a7bf0982154231a5148c92eccd183f,
title = "The qualified presumption of safety assessment and its role in EFSA risk evaluations: 15 years past",
abstract = "Microorganisms are intentionally added at different stages of the food and feed chain (food or feed additive, novel food or plant protection product) and are subjected to regulation and safety assessment by the European Food Safety Authority. Safety evaluation is based on application dossiers for market authorisation to the European Commission. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) concept was developed in 20031 to provide a harmonised generic safety pre-appraisal of the above microorganisms. Unambiguously defined biological taxonomic units (TUs) are assessed for their body of knowledge, their safety and their end use. Identified safety concerns for a certain TU can be, where reasonable in number and not universally present, reflected as 'qualifications.' Strains belonging to TUs having QPS status may benefit of a fast track evaluation. The lowest TU for which the QPS status is granted is the species level for bacteria and yeasts and the family for viruses. The QPS concept is also applicable to genetically modified microorganisms used for production purposes. Based on the current body of knowledge and/or the ambiguous taxonomic position, some TUs, such as filamentous fungi, bacteriophages, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Streptomyces spp. and Oomycetes, are not considered liable for QPS status.",
author = "Lieve Herman and Marianne Chemaly and Cocconcelli, {Pier Sandro} and Pablo Fernandez and G{\"u}nter Klein and Luisa Peixe and Miguel Prieto and Amparo Querol and Suarez, {Juan Evaristo} and Ingvar Sundh and Just Vlak and Sandra Correia",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1093/femsle/fny260",
language = "English",
volume = "366",
journal = "FEMS Microbiology Letters",
issn = "0378-1097",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Herman, L, Chemaly, M, Cocconcelli, PS, Fernandez, P, Klein, G, Peixe, L, Prieto, M, Querol, A, Suarez, JE, Sundh, I, Vlak, J & Correia, S 2018, 'The qualified presumption of safety assessment and its role in EFSA risk evaluations: 15 years past', FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 366, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny260

The qualified presumption of safety assessment and its role in EFSA risk evaluations : 15 years past. / Herman, Lieve; Chemaly, Marianne; Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro; Fernandez, Pablo; Klein, Günter; Peixe, Luisa; Prieto, Miguel; Querol, Amparo; Suarez, Juan Evaristo; Sundh, Ingvar; Vlak, Just; Correia, Sandra.

In: FEMS Microbiology Letters, Vol. 366, No. 1, 10.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The qualified presumption of safety assessment and its role in EFSA risk evaluations

T2 - FEMS Microbiology Letters

AU - Herman, Lieve

AU - Chemaly, Marianne

AU - Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro

AU - Fernandez, Pablo

AU - Klein, Günter

AU - Peixe, Luisa

AU - Prieto, Miguel

AU - Querol, Amparo

AU - Suarez, Juan Evaristo

AU - Sundh, Ingvar

AU - Vlak, Just

AU - Correia, Sandra

PY - 2018/12/10

Y1 - 2018/12/10

N2 - Microorganisms are intentionally added at different stages of the food and feed chain (food or feed additive, novel food or plant protection product) and are subjected to regulation and safety assessment by the European Food Safety Authority. Safety evaluation is based on application dossiers for market authorisation to the European Commission. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) concept was developed in 20031 to provide a harmonised generic safety pre-appraisal of the above microorganisms. Unambiguously defined biological taxonomic units (TUs) are assessed for their body of knowledge, their safety and their end use. Identified safety concerns for a certain TU can be, where reasonable in number and not universally present, reflected as 'qualifications.' Strains belonging to TUs having QPS status may benefit of a fast track evaluation. The lowest TU for which the QPS status is granted is the species level for bacteria and yeasts and the family for viruses. The QPS concept is also applicable to genetically modified microorganisms used for production purposes. Based on the current body of knowledge and/or the ambiguous taxonomic position, some TUs, such as filamentous fungi, bacteriophages, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Streptomyces spp. and Oomycetes, are not considered liable for QPS status.

AB - Microorganisms are intentionally added at different stages of the food and feed chain (food or feed additive, novel food or plant protection product) and are subjected to regulation and safety assessment by the European Food Safety Authority. Safety evaluation is based on application dossiers for market authorisation to the European Commission. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) concept was developed in 20031 to provide a harmonised generic safety pre-appraisal of the above microorganisms. Unambiguously defined biological taxonomic units (TUs) are assessed for their body of knowledge, their safety and their end use. Identified safety concerns for a certain TU can be, where reasonable in number and not universally present, reflected as 'qualifications.' Strains belonging to TUs having QPS status may benefit of a fast track evaluation. The lowest TU for which the QPS status is granted is the species level for bacteria and yeasts and the family for viruses. The QPS concept is also applicable to genetically modified microorganisms used for production purposes. Based on the current body of knowledge and/or the ambiguous taxonomic position, some TUs, such as filamentous fungi, bacteriophages, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Streptomyces spp. and Oomycetes, are not considered liable for QPS status.

U2 - 10.1093/femsle/fny260

DO - 10.1093/femsle/fny260

M3 - Article

VL - 366

JO - FEMS Microbiology Letters

JF - FEMS Microbiology Letters

SN - 0378-1097

IS - 1

ER -