Abstract
In the past forty years, numerous proposals to improve the fragmented international
environmental governance (IEG) system have been developed, many of which call
for the establishment of an international environment organisation. Although governments
and scholars agree that the system needs improvement, no such substantial reform has yet
been undertaken. Based on the literature study and more than twenty interviews, this article
explains the absence of an international environment organisation, using three theories of
new institutionalism: historical, rational choice and discursive institutionalism. Through
the notion of path dependency, historical institutionalism explains how the self-reinforcing
cycle of a rather diffused development of the IEG system, characterised by incremental
changes, has made the system more complicated and prevented substantial institutional
change. Historical institutionalism also highlights power inequalities and lack of trust
between nation-states, as well as turf wars between international organisations, as key
explanatory factors hampering IEG reform. Rational choice institutionalism complements
such explanations by showing how incremental institutional changes that do not add up to
substantial reform are the result of the fact that neither nation-states nor international
organisations are interested in establishing a powerful environment organisation that might
encroach upon their sovereignty. Finally, discursive institutionalism suggests that the norm
to do at least something to improve the IEG system has prompted nation-states to create
‘‘symbolic’’ institutions. The concept of socialisation helps to explain why incremental
institutional developments within the UN system are more likely than substantial reform.
The article shows that new institutionalism theories complement rather than contradict one
another, resulting in a more holistic explanation of lack of IEG reform.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 153-176 |
Journal | International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- governance
- politics