The power of argument

Enhancing citizen’s valuation of and attitude towards agricultural biodiversity

Hens Runhaar*, Piety Runhaar, Machiel Bouwmans, Simon Vink, Arjen Buijs, David Kleijn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Agrobiodiversity has been decreasing substantially in Europe. Social scientific research in this area has paid limited attention to how citizens value agrobiodiversity and its decline, and how these valuations can be influenced. We explore the influence of different arguments for enhancing agro-biodiversity, delivered via short movies, on attitudes and behaviour of students, environmental professionals and people interested in nature conservation in the Netherlands. We conclude that information provision does not influence attitudes. However, it does influence values assigned to agrobiodiversity, but not always in the ways we hypothesized. Information about the intrinsic value of agrobiodiversity has the most effects on values assigned to agrobiodiversity. Among students, women and people with a low emotional attachment with agricultural landscapes (‘place identity’ and ‘place dependence’), emphasizing the instrumental value of agrobiodiversity has a counter-intuitive effect. It does not influence the importance of this value but instead reinforces the intrinsic value they assign to agrobiodiversity. The latter finding is at odds with the instrumental biodiversity discourse in science and policy, which, under headings such as ecosystem services and natural capital, aims to mobilize support for nature conservation by emphasizing its instrumental, functional and economic values. Emphasizing the intrinsic value of agrobiodiversity seems more effective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-242
JournalInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 May 2019

Fingerprint

biodiversity
natural resources conservation
Biodiversity
Agrobiodiversity
natural capital
economic valuation
ecosystem services
Netherlands
students
Intrinsic value

Keywords

  • aesthetical value
  • Agriculture
  • agrobiodiversity
  • instrumental value
  • intrinsic value
  • motivations
  • the Netherlands

Cite this

@article{34aa4e7b05c24c10bf9cc5d65bcde608,
title = "The power of argument: Enhancing citizen’s valuation of and attitude towards agricultural biodiversity",
abstract = "Agrobiodiversity has been decreasing substantially in Europe. Social scientific research in this area has paid limited attention to how citizens value agrobiodiversity and its decline, and how these valuations can be influenced. We explore the influence of different arguments for enhancing agro-biodiversity, delivered via short movies, on attitudes and behaviour of students, environmental professionals and people interested in nature conservation in the Netherlands. We conclude that information provision does not influence attitudes. However, it does influence values assigned to agrobiodiversity, but not always in the ways we hypothesized. Information about the intrinsic value of agrobiodiversity has the most effects on values assigned to agrobiodiversity. Among students, women and people with a low emotional attachment with agricultural landscapes (‘place identity’ and ‘place dependence’), emphasizing the instrumental value of agrobiodiversity has a counter-intuitive effect. It does not influence the importance of this value but instead reinforces the intrinsic value they assign to agrobiodiversity. The latter finding is at odds with the instrumental biodiversity discourse in science and policy, which, under headings such as ecosystem services and natural capital, aims to mobilize support for nature conservation by emphasizing its instrumental, functional and economic values. Emphasizing the intrinsic value of agrobiodiversity seems more effective.",
keywords = "aesthetical value, Agriculture, agrobiodiversity, instrumental value, intrinsic value, motivations, the Netherlands",
author = "Hens Runhaar and Piety Runhaar and Machiel Bouwmans and Simon Vink and Arjen Buijs and David Kleijn",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1080/14735903.2019.1619966",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "231--242",
journal = "International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability",
issn = "1473-5903",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The power of argument

T2 - Enhancing citizen’s valuation of and attitude towards agricultural biodiversity

AU - Runhaar, Hens

AU - Runhaar, Piety

AU - Bouwmans, Machiel

AU - Vink, Simon

AU - Buijs, Arjen

AU - Kleijn, David

PY - 2019/5/25

Y1 - 2019/5/25

N2 - Agrobiodiversity has been decreasing substantially in Europe. Social scientific research in this area has paid limited attention to how citizens value agrobiodiversity and its decline, and how these valuations can be influenced. We explore the influence of different arguments for enhancing agro-biodiversity, delivered via short movies, on attitudes and behaviour of students, environmental professionals and people interested in nature conservation in the Netherlands. We conclude that information provision does not influence attitudes. However, it does influence values assigned to agrobiodiversity, but not always in the ways we hypothesized. Information about the intrinsic value of agrobiodiversity has the most effects on values assigned to agrobiodiversity. Among students, women and people with a low emotional attachment with agricultural landscapes (‘place identity’ and ‘place dependence’), emphasizing the instrumental value of agrobiodiversity has a counter-intuitive effect. It does not influence the importance of this value but instead reinforces the intrinsic value they assign to agrobiodiversity. The latter finding is at odds with the instrumental biodiversity discourse in science and policy, which, under headings such as ecosystem services and natural capital, aims to mobilize support for nature conservation by emphasizing its instrumental, functional and economic values. Emphasizing the intrinsic value of agrobiodiversity seems more effective.

AB - Agrobiodiversity has been decreasing substantially in Europe. Social scientific research in this area has paid limited attention to how citizens value agrobiodiversity and its decline, and how these valuations can be influenced. We explore the influence of different arguments for enhancing agro-biodiversity, delivered via short movies, on attitudes and behaviour of students, environmental professionals and people interested in nature conservation in the Netherlands. We conclude that information provision does not influence attitudes. However, it does influence values assigned to agrobiodiversity, but not always in the ways we hypothesized. Information about the intrinsic value of agrobiodiversity has the most effects on values assigned to agrobiodiversity. Among students, women and people with a low emotional attachment with agricultural landscapes (‘place identity’ and ‘place dependence’), emphasizing the instrumental value of agrobiodiversity has a counter-intuitive effect. It does not influence the importance of this value but instead reinforces the intrinsic value they assign to agrobiodiversity. The latter finding is at odds with the instrumental biodiversity discourse in science and policy, which, under headings such as ecosystem services and natural capital, aims to mobilize support for nature conservation by emphasizing its instrumental, functional and economic values. Emphasizing the intrinsic value of agrobiodiversity seems more effective.

KW - aesthetical value

KW - Agriculture

KW - agrobiodiversity

KW - instrumental value

KW - intrinsic value

KW - motivations

KW - the Netherlands

U2 - 10.1080/14735903.2019.1619966

DO - 10.1080/14735903.2019.1619966

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 231

EP - 242

JO - International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

JF - International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

SN - 1473-5903

IS - 3

ER -