The potential of antiviral agents to control classical swine fever: A modelling study.

J.A. Backer, R. Vrancken, J. Neyts, N. Goris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Classical swine fever (CSF) represents a continuous threat to pig populations that are free of disease without vaccination. When CSF virus is introduced, the minimal control strategy imposed by the EU is often insufficient to mitigate the epidemic. Additional measures such as preemptive culling encounter ethical objections, whereas emergency vaccination leads to prolonged export restrictions. Antiviral agents, however, provide instantaneous protection without inducing an antibody response. The use of antiviral agents to contain CSF epidemics is studied with a model describing within- and between-herd virus transmission. Epidemics are simulated in a densely populated livestock area in The Netherlands, with farms of varying sizes and pig types (finishers, piglets and sows). Our results show that vaccination and/or antiviral treatment in a 2 km radius around an infected herd is more effective than preemptive culling in a 1 km radius. However, the instantaneous but temporary protection provided by antiviral treatment is slightly less effective than the delayed but long-lasting protection offered by vaccination. Therefore, the most effective control strategy is to vaccinate animals when allowed (finishers and piglets) and to treat with antiviral agents when vaccination is prohibited (sows). As independent control measure, antiviral treatment in a 1 km radius presents an elevated risk of epidemics running out of control. A 2 km control radius largely eliminates this risk.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-250
JournalAntiviral Research
Volume99
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Classical Swine Fever
Antiviral Agents
Vaccination
Swine
Classical swine fever virus
Livestock
Netherlands
Antibody Formation
Emergencies
Therapeutics
Viruses
Population

Keywords

  • virus
  • netherlands
  • pigs
  • transmission
  • vaccination
  • strategies
  • epidemics
  • marker

Cite this

Backer, J.A. ; Vrancken, R. ; Neyts, J. ; Goris, N. / The potential of antiviral agents to control classical swine fever: A modelling study. In: Antiviral Research. 2013 ; Vol. 99, No. 3. pp. 245-250.
@article{4b6fc826587e4002abd7947d4fd8005f,
title = "The potential of antiviral agents to control classical swine fever: A modelling study.",
abstract = "Classical swine fever (CSF) represents a continuous threat to pig populations that are free of disease without vaccination. When CSF virus is introduced, the minimal control strategy imposed by the EU is often insufficient to mitigate the epidemic. Additional measures such as preemptive culling encounter ethical objections, whereas emergency vaccination leads to prolonged export restrictions. Antiviral agents, however, provide instantaneous protection without inducing an antibody response. The use of antiviral agents to contain CSF epidemics is studied with a model describing within- and between-herd virus transmission. Epidemics are simulated in a densely populated livestock area in The Netherlands, with farms of varying sizes and pig types (finishers, piglets and sows). Our results show that vaccination and/or antiviral treatment in a 2 km radius around an infected herd is more effective than preemptive culling in a 1 km radius. However, the instantaneous but temporary protection provided by antiviral treatment is slightly less effective than the delayed but long-lasting protection offered by vaccination. Therefore, the most effective control strategy is to vaccinate animals when allowed (finishers and piglets) and to treat with antiviral agents when vaccination is prohibited (sows). As independent control measure, antiviral treatment in a 1 km radius presents an elevated risk of epidemics running out of control. A 2 km control radius largely eliminates this risk.",
keywords = "virus, netherlands, pigs, transmission, vaccination, strategies, epidemics, marker",
author = "J.A. Backer and R. Vrancken and J. Neyts and N. Goris",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.06.013",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "245--250",
journal = "Antiviral Research",
issn = "0166-3542",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

The potential of antiviral agents to control classical swine fever: A modelling study. / Backer, J.A.; Vrancken, R.; Neyts, J.; Goris, N.

In: Antiviral Research, Vol. 99, No. 3, 2013, p. 245-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The potential of antiviral agents to control classical swine fever: A modelling study.

AU - Backer, J.A.

AU - Vrancken, R.

AU - Neyts, J.

AU - Goris, N.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Classical swine fever (CSF) represents a continuous threat to pig populations that are free of disease without vaccination. When CSF virus is introduced, the minimal control strategy imposed by the EU is often insufficient to mitigate the epidemic. Additional measures such as preemptive culling encounter ethical objections, whereas emergency vaccination leads to prolonged export restrictions. Antiviral agents, however, provide instantaneous protection without inducing an antibody response. The use of antiviral agents to contain CSF epidemics is studied with a model describing within- and between-herd virus transmission. Epidemics are simulated in a densely populated livestock area in The Netherlands, with farms of varying sizes and pig types (finishers, piglets and sows). Our results show that vaccination and/or antiviral treatment in a 2 km radius around an infected herd is more effective than preemptive culling in a 1 km radius. However, the instantaneous but temporary protection provided by antiviral treatment is slightly less effective than the delayed but long-lasting protection offered by vaccination. Therefore, the most effective control strategy is to vaccinate animals when allowed (finishers and piglets) and to treat with antiviral agents when vaccination is prohibited (sows). As independent control measure, antiviral treatment in a 1 km radius presents an elevated risk of epidemics running out of control. A 2 km control radius largely eliminates this risk.

AB - Classical swine fever (CSF) represents a continuous threat to pig populations that are free of disease without vaccination. When CSF virus is introduced, the minimal control strategy imposed by the EU is often insufficient to mitigate the epidemic. Additional measures such as preemptive culling encounter ethical objections, whereas emergency vaccination leads to prolonged export restrictions. Antiviral agents, however, provide instantaneous protection without inducing an antibody response. The use of antiviral agents to contain CSF epidemics is studied with a model describing within- and between-herd virus transmission. Epidemics are simulated in a densely populated livestock area in The Netherlands, with farms of varying sizes and pig types (finishers, piglets and sows). Our results show that vaccination and/or antiviral treatment in a 2 km radius around an infected herd is more effective than preemptive culling in a 1 km radius. However, the instantaneous but temporary protection provided by antiviral treatment is slightly less effective than the delayed but long-lasting protection offered by vaccination. Therefore, the most effective control strategy is to vaccinate animals when allowed (finishers and piglets) and to treat with antiviral agents when vaccination is prohibited (sows). As independent control measure, antiviral treatment in a 1 km radius presents an elevated risk of epidemics running out of control. A 2 km control radius largely eliminates this risk.

KW - virus

KW - netherlands

KW - pigs

KW - transmission

KW - vaccination

KW - strategies

KW - epidemics

KW - marker

U2 - 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.06.013

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 245

EP - 250

JO - Antiviral Research

JF - Antiviral Research

SN - 0166-3542

IS - 3

ER -