The potency of the SPS Agreement’s ‘excessivity test’: The impact of Article 5.6 on trade liberalization and the regulatory power of WTO members to take sanitary and phytosanitary measures

H. Schebesta, D.A. Sinopoli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The article investigates the current and potential relevance of Article 5.6 SPS in deciding SPS disputes, and its impact on trade liberalization and WTO Members’ power to take sanitary and phytosanitary measures.
Article 5.6 of the SPS Agreement states that SPS measures may not be more trade restrictive than required to achieve a Member's appropriate level of protection. This obligation is self-standing and separate (in Article 5.6) from the necessity test (Article 2.2). We argue that its autonomous nature makes Article 5.6 SPS a distinct type of trade-off instrument (‘excessivity test’).
Using the software ATLAS.ti, we conducted a systematic content analysis of all SPS disputes invoking Article 5.6. In particular, we surveyed the jurisprudential development of the provision (outcomes of 5.6 SPS cases over time, DSB application of the three cumulative conditions and their respective outcome determinacy).

Our findings show that the importance of Article 5.6 has significantly increased over time, and holds immense potential for challenges to WTO Members domestic SPS measures for being excessively trade restrictive.
LanguageEnglish
Pages123-149
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of International Economic Law
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

WTO
liberalization
obligation
content analysis
Trade liberalization
Dispute
time
Obligation
Trade-offs
Content analysis
Software
Determinacy
software

Cite this

@article{83f0a5386995415ebad99f121d82f1e9,
title = "The potency of the SPS Agreement’s ‘excessivity test’: The impact of Article 5.6 on trade liberalization and the regulatory power of WTO members to take sanitary and phytosanitary measures",
abstract = "The article investigates the current and potential relevance of Article 5.6 SPS in deciding SPS disputes, and its impact on trade liberalization and WTO Members’ power to take sanitary and phytosanitary measures.Article 5.6 of the SPS Agreement states that SPS measures may not be more trade restrictive than required to achieve a Member's appropriate level of protection. This obligation is self-standing and separate (in Article 5.6) from the necessity test (Article 2.2). We argue that its autonomous nature makes Article 5.6 SPS a distinct type of trade-off instrument (‘excessivity test’).Using the software ATLAS.ti, we conducted a systematic content analysis of all SPS disputes invoking Article 5.6. In particular, we surveyed the jurisprudential development of the provision (outcomes of 5.6 SPS cases over time, DSB application of the three cumulative conditions and their respective outcome determinacy).Our findings show that the importance of Article 5.6 has significantly increased over time, and holds immense potential for challenges to WTO Members domestic SPS measures for being excessively trade restrictive.",
author = "H. Schebesta and D.A. Sinopoli",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1093/jiel/jgy003",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "123--149",
journal = "Journal of International Economic Law",
issn = "1369-3034",
publisher = "Oxford Academic",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The potency of the SPS Agreement’s ‘excessivity test’

T2 - Journal of International Economic Law

AU - Schebesta, H.

AU - Sinopoli, D.A.

PY - 2018/3/20

Y1 - 2018/3/20

N2 - The article investigates the current and potential relevance of Article 5.6 SPS in deciding SPS disputes, and its impact on trade liberalization and WTO Members’ power to take sanitary and phytosanitary measures.Article 5.6 of the SPS Agreement states that SPS measures may not be more trade restrictive than required to achieve a Member's appropriate level of protection. This obligation is self-standing and separate (in Article 5.6) from the necessity test (Article 2.2). We argue that its autonomous nature makes Article 5.6 SPS a distinct type of trade-off instrument (‘excessivity test’).Using the software ATLAS.ti, we conducted a systematic content analysis of all SPS disputes invoking Article 5.6. In particular, we surveyed the jurisprudential development of the provision (outcomes of 5.6 SPS cases over time, DSB application of the three cumulative conditions and their respective outcome determinacy).Our findings show that the importance of Article 5.6 has significantly increased over time, and holds immense potential for challenges to WTO Members domestic SPS measures for being excessively trade restrictive.

AB - The article investigates the current and potential relevance of Article 5.6 SPS in deciding SPS disputes, and its impact on trade liberalization and WTO Members’ power to take sanitary and phytosanitary measures.Article 5.6 of the SPS Agreement states that SPS measures may not be more trade restrictive than required to achieve a Member's appropriate level of protection. This obligation is self-standing and separate (in Article 5.6) from the necessity test (Article 2.2). We argue that its autonomous nature makes Article 5.6 SPS a distinct type of trade-off instrument (‘excessivity test’).Using the software ATLAS.ti, we conducted a systematic content analysis of all SPS disputes invoking Article 5.6. In particular, we surveyed the jurisprudential development of the provision (outcomes of 5.6 SPS cases over time, DSB application of the three cumulative conditions and their respective outcome determinacy).Our findings show that the importance of Article 5.6 has significantly increased over time, and holds immense potential for challenges to WTO Members domestic SPS measures for being excessively trade restrictive.

U2 - 10.1093/jiel/jgy003

DO - 10.1093/jiel/jgy003

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 123

EP - 149

JO - Journal of International Economic Law

JF - Journal of International Economic Law

SN - 1369-3034

IS - 1

ER -