Abstract
Ethical labels signal positive ethical quality of a product but fail to create massive
demand for such products. Based on regulatory focus theory and prospect theory, it is argued
that negative signalling of low ethical quality would have a stronger effect on the adoption of
ethical products than the current positive signalling of high ethical quality. The effect of
positive versus negative signalling of high versus low ethical quality on attitude and preference
formation is tested in three experimental studies (N=81; N=170; N=177). Results show (1)
that negative labelling has more effect on attitude and preference than positive labelling, (2)
that the effect of labelling is enhanced by regulatory fit, and (3) that the effect of labelling is
mediated by personal norms. No evidence of either mediation or moderation by environmental
concern was found.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 19-38 |
Journal | Journal of Consumer Policy |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Consumption
- Negative labelling
- Personal norms
- Regulatory fit
- Sustainability