The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation

E. Turnhout, T.A.P. Metze, Carina Wyborn, Nicole Klenk, Elena Louder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Literature on co-production is booming. Yet, most literature is aspirational and methodological in nature, focusing on why co-production is important for environmental governance and knowledge production and how it should be done, and does not address the question why these processes often fail to achieve stated objectives of empowerment and societal transformation. In this review, we address this gap by reviewing literature on the political and power dimensions of co-production. Our review shows how depoliticization dynamics in co-production reinforce rather than mitigate existing unequal power relations and how they prevent wider societal transformation from taking place. Drawing on literature about participation, deliberative governance, and democracy, the review concludes by emphasizing the importance of (re)politicizing co-production by allowing for pluralism and for the contestation of knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-21
JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Volume42
Early online date27 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

Fingerprint

coproduction
politics
participation
power relations
empowerment
democracy
governance
knowledge production
pluralism
literature

Cite this

@article{d430c907f65c4a589255eb3defe1f611,
title = "The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation",
abstract = "Literature on co-production is booming. Yet, most literature is aspirational and methodological in nature, focusing on why co-production is important for environmental governance and knowledge production and how it should be done, and does not address the question why these processes often fail to achieve stated objectives of empowerment and societal transformation. In this review, we address this gap by reviewing literature on the political and power dimensions of co-production. Our review shows how depoliticization dynamics in co-production reinforce rather than mitigate existing unequal power relations and how they prevent wider societal transformation from taking place. Drawing on literature about participation, deliberative governance, and democracy, the review concludes by emphasizing the importance of (re)politicizing co-production by allowing for pluralism and for the contestation of knowledge.",
author = "E. Turnhout and T.A.P. Metze and Carina Wyborn and Nicole Klenk and Elena Louder",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "15--21",
journal = "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability",
issn = "1877-3435",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. / Turnhout, E.; Metze, T.A.P.; Wyborn, Carina; Klenk, Nicole; Louder, Elena.

In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 42, 02.2020, p. 15-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation

AU - Turnhout, E.

AU - Metze, T.A.P.

AU - Wyborn, Carina

AU - Klenk, Nicole

AU - Louder, Elena

PY - 2020/2

Y1 - 2020/2

N2 - Literature on co-production is booming. Yet, most literature is aspirational and methodological in nature, focusing on why co-production is important for environmental governance and knowledge production and how it should be done, and does not address the question why these processes often fail to achieve stated objectives of empowerment and societal transformation. In this review, we address this gap by reviewing literature on the political and power dimensions of co-production. Our review shows how depoliticization dynamics in co-production reinforce rather than mitigate existing unequal power relations and how they prevent wider societal transformation from taking place. Drawing on literature about participation, deliberative governance, and democracy, the review concludes by emphasizing the importance of (re)politicizing co-production by allowing for pluralism and for the contestation of knowledge.

AB - Literature on co-production is booming. Yet, most literature is aspirational and methodological in nature, focusing on why co-production is important for environmental governance and knowledge production and how it should be done, and does not address the question why these processes often fail to achieve stated objectives of empowerment and societal transformation. In this review, we address this gap by reviewing literature on the political and power dimensions of co-production. Our review shows how depoliticization dynamics in co-production reinforce rather than mitigate existing unequal power relations and how they prevent wider societal transformation from taking place. Drawing on literature about participation, deliberative governance, and democracy, the review concludes by emphasizing the importance of (re)politicizing co-production by allowing for pluralism and for the contestation of knowledge.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 15

EP - 21

JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

SN - 1877-3435

ER -