The need to implement the landscape of fear within rodent pest management strategies

Inge M. Krijger*, Steven R. Belmain, Grant R. Singleton, Peter W.G. Groot Koerkamp, Bastiaan G. Meerburg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current reactive pest management methods have serious drawbacks such as the heavy reliance on chemicals, emerging genetic rodenticide resistance and high secondary exposure risks. Rodent control needs to be based on pest species ecology and ethology to facilitate the development of ecologically based rodent management (EBRM). An important aspect of EBRM is a strong understanding of rodent pest species ecology, behaviour and spatiotemporal factors. Gaining insight into the behaviour of pest species is a key aspect of EBRM. The landscape of fear (LOF) is a mapping of the spatial variation in the foraging cost arising from the risk of predation, and reflects the levels of fear a prey species perceives at different locations within its home range. In practice, the LOF maps habitat use as a result of perceived fear, which shows where bait or traps are most likely to be encountered and used by rodents. Several studies have linked perceived predation risk of foraging animals with quitting-harvest rates or giving-up densities (GUDs). GUDs have been used to reflect foraging behaviour strategies of predator avoidance, but to our knowledge very few papers have directly used GUDs in relation to pest management strategies. An opportunity for rodent control strategies lies in the integration of the LOF of rodents in EBRM methodologies. Rodent management could be more efficient and effective by concentrating on those areas where rodents perceive the least levels of predation risk.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2397-2402
JournalPest Management Science
Volume73
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

pest management
fearfulness
rodents
rodent control
pests
foraging
predation
ecology
rodenticides
secondary contact
concentrating
animal behavior
baits
spatial variation
traps
predators
habitats
methodology

Keywords

  • ecologically based rodent management
  • GUD
  • IPM
  • landscape of fear
  • predation risk
  • rodent control
  • rodent ecology

Cite this

@article{75d69f35ffa748e2bdbf1e9e7e474a3f,
title = "The need to implement the landscape of fear within rodent pest management strategies",
abstract = "Current reactive pest management methods have serious drawbacks such as the heavy reliance on chemicals, emerging genetic rodenticide resistance and high secondary exposure risks. Rodent control needs to be based on pest species ecology and ethology to facilitate the development of ecologically based rodent management (EBRM). An important aspect of EBRM is a strong understanding of rodent pest species ecology, behaviour and spatiotemporal factors. Gaining insight into the behaviour of pest species is a key aspect of EBRM. The landscape of fear (LOF) is a mapping of the spatial variation in the foraging cost arising from the risk of predation, and reflects the levels of fear a prey species perceives at different locations within its home range. In practice, the LOF maps habitat use as a result of perceived fear, which shows where bait or traps are most likely to be encountered and used by rodents. Several studies have linked perceived predation risk of foraging animals with quitting-harvest rates or giving-up densities (GUDs). GUDs have been used to reflect foraging behaviour strategies of predator avoidance, but to our knowledge very few papers have directly used GUDs in relation to pest management strategies. An opportunity for rodent control strategies lies in the integration of the LOF of rodents in EBRM methodologies. Rodent management could be more efficient and effective by concentrating on those areas where rodents perceive the least levels of predation risk.",
keywords = "ecologically based rodent management, GUD, IPM, landscape of fear, predation risk, rodent control, rodent ecology",
author = "Krijger, {Inge M.} and Belmain, {Steven R.} and Singleton, {Grant R.} and {Groot Koerkamp}, {Peter W.G.} and Meerburg, {Bastiaan G.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ps.4626",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "2397--2402",
journal = "Pest Management Science",
issn = "1526-498X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "12",

}

The need to implement the landscape of fear within rodent pest management strategies. / Krijger, Inge M.; Belmain, Steven R.; Singleton, Grant R.; Groot Koerkamp, Peter W.G.; Meerburg, Bastiaan G.

In: Pest Management Science, Vol. 73, No. 12, 01.12.2017, p. 2397-2402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The need to implement the landscape of fear within rodent pest management strategies

AU - Krijger, Inge M.

AU - Belmain, Steven R.

AU - Singleton, Grant R.

AU - Groot Koerkamp, Peter W.G.

AU - Meerburg, Bastiaan G.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Current reactive pest management methods have serious drawbacks such as the heavy reliance on chemicals, emerging genetic rodenticide resistance and high secondary exposure risks. Rodent control needs to be based on pest species ecology and ethology to facilitate the development of ecologically based rodent management (EBRM). An important aspect of EBRM is a strong understanding of rodent pest species ecology, behaviour and spatiotemporal factors. Gaining insight into the behaviour of pest species is a key aspect of EBRM. The landscape of fear (LOF) is a mapping of the spatial variation in the foraging cost arising from the risk of predation, and reflects the levels of fear a prey species perceives at different locations within its home range. In practice, the LOF maps habitat use as a result of perceived fear, which shows where bait or traps are most likely to be encountered and used by rodents. Several studies have linked perceived predation risk of foraging animals with quitting-harvest rates or giving-up densities (GUDs). GUDs have been used to reflect foraging behaviour strategies of predator avoidance, but to our knowledge very few papers have directly used GUDs in relation to pest management strategies. An opportunity for rodent control strategies lies in the integration of the LOF of rodents in EBRM methodologies. Rodent management could be more efficient and effective by concentrating on those areas where rodents perceive the least levels of predation risk.

AB - Current reactive pest management methods have serious drawbacks such as the heavy reliance on chemicals, emerging genetic rodenticide resistance and high secondary exposure risks. Rodent control needs to be based on pest species ecology and ethology to facilitate the development of ecologically based rodent management (EBRM). An important aspect of EBRM is a strong understanding of rodent pest species ecology, behaviour and spatiotemporal factors. Gaining insight into the behaviour of pest species is a key aspect of EBRM. The landscape of fear (LOF) is a mapping of the spatial variation in the foraging cost arising from the risk of predation, and reflects the levels of fear a prey species perceives at different locations within its home range. In practice, the LOF maps habitat use as a result of perceived fear, which shows where bait or traps are most likely to be encountered and used by rodents. Several studies have linked perceived predation risk of foraging animals with quitting-harvest rates or giving-up densities (GUDs). GUDs have been used to reflect foraging behaviour strategies of predator avoidance, but to our knowledge very few papers have directly used GUDs in relation to pest management strategies. An opportunity for rodent control strategies lies in the integration of the LOF of rodents in EBRM methodologies. Rodent management could be more efficient and effective by concentrating on those areas where rodents perceive the least levels of predation risk.

KW - ecologically based rodent management

KW - GUD

KW - IPM

KW - landscape of fear

KW - predation risk

KW - rodent control

KW - rodent ecology

U2 - 10.1002/ps.4626

DO - 10.1002/ps.4626

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 2397

EP - 2402

JO - Pest Management Science

JF - Pest Management Science

SN - 1526-498X

IS - 12

ER -