The moderating effect of motivation on health-related decision-making

Aleksandra Berezowska*, Arnout R.H. Fischer, Hans van Trijp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study identifies how autonomous and controlled motivation moderates the cognitive process that drives the adoption of personalised nutrition services. The cognitive process comprises perceptions of privacy risk, personalisation benefit, and their determinants. Design: Depending on their level of autonomous and controlled motivation, participants (N = 3453) were assigned to one of four motivational orientations, which resulted in a 2 (low/high autonomous motivation) × 2 (low/high controlled motivation) quasi-experimental design. Results: High levels of autonomous motivation strengthened the extent to which: (1) the benefits of engaging with a service determined the outcome of a risk-benefit trade-off; (2) the effectiveness of a service determined benefit perceptions. High levels of controlled motivation influenced the extent to which: (1) the risk of privacy loss determined the outcome of a risk-benefit trade-off; (2) controlling personal information after disclosure and perceiving the disclosed personal information as sensitive determined the risk of potential privacy loss. Conclusion: To encourage the adoption of personalised dietary recommendations, for individuals with high levels of autonomous motivation emphasis should be on benefits and its determinants. For those with high levels of controlled motivation, it is important to focus on risk-related issues such as information sensitivity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)665-685
JournalPsychology and Health
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • adoption
  • autonomous motivation
  • controlled motivation
  • decision-making
  • personalised nutrition
  • risk-benefit trade-off

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The moderating effect of motivation on health-related decision-making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this