The low-dose benzene debate needs a sharp blade

Peter J. Boogaard*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The health effects of benzene have been a major concern for regulators and health experts for many years. This has led to significantly lower regulatory threshold limits (such as occupational exposure limits, OELs) and the implementation of corresponding risk management measures to reduce benzene concentrations and human exposure to benzene in the production, transport and use of petroleum products such as gasolines. Over the past decade, a series of research papers has been published by a group of researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, who postulated effects of benzene at very low dose exposures—levels which are relevant to current operations in the oil and gas industry and are currently (well) below the occupational exposure limits in most jurisdictions. A strong public scientific debate followed the publication of these papers, and in response to this, Concawe concluded a research project this year with two independent consultants who reanalysed the dataset to shed new light on this ongoing debate.
This Concawe Review article provides the reader with a short overview of the scientific argumentation in the ongoing discussions on this topic as an example of an educational scientific debate, and puts it into perspective based on the results of the Concawe project.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-241
JournalChemico-Biological Interactions
Volume278
Early online date24 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Benzene
Occupational Exposure
Health
Gasoline
Petroleum products
Petroleum
Risk Management
Gas industry
Consultants
Risk management
Research
Publications
Oils
Research Personnel

Cite this

@article{a78fc890da624efa839a0cf37651fa3a,
title = "The low-dose benzene debate needs a sharp blade",
abstract = "The health effects of benzene have been a major concern for regulators and health experts for many years. This has led to significantly lower regulatory threshold limits (such as occupational exposure limits, OELs) and the implementation of corresponding risk management measures to reduce benzene concentrations and human exposure to benzene in the production, transport and use of petroleum products such as gasolines. Over the past decade, a series of research papers has been published by a group of researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, who postulated effects of benzene at very low dose exposures—levels which are relevant to current operations in the oil and gas industry and are currently (well) below the occupational exposure limits in most jurisdictions. A strong public scientific debate followed the publication of these papers, and in response to this, Concawe concluded a research project this year with two independent consultants who reanalysed the dataset to shed new light on this ongoing debate.This Concawe Review article provides the reader with a short overview of the scientific argumentation in the ongoing discussions on this topic as an example of an educational scientific debate, and puts it into perspective based on the results of the Concawe project.",
author = "Boogaard, {Peter J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1016/j.cbi.2017.06.023",
language = "English",
volume = "278",
pages = "239--241",
journal = "Chemico-Biological Interactions",
issn = "0009-2797",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The low-dose benzene debate needs a sharp blade. / Boogaard, Peter J.

In: Chemico-Biological Interactions, Vol. 278, 25.12.2017, p. 239-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The low-dose benzene debate needs a sharp blade

AU - Boogaard, Peter J.

PY - 2017/12/25

Y1 - 2017/12/25

N2 - The health effects of benzene have been a major concern for regulators and health experts for many years. This has led to significantly lower regulatory threshold limits (such as occupational exposure limits, OELs) and the implementation of corresponding risk management measures to reduce benzene concentrations and human exposure to benzene in the production, transport and use of petroleum products such as gasolines. Over the past decade, a series of research papers has been published by a group of researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, who postulated effects of benzene at very low dose exposures—levels which are relevant to current operations in the oil and gas industry and are currently (well) below the occupational exposure limits in most jurisdictions. A strong public scientific debate followed the publication of these papers, and in response to this, Concawe concluded a research project this year with two independent consultants who reanalysed the dataset to shed new light on this ongoing debate.This Concawe Review article provides the reader with a short overview of the scientific argumentation in the ongoing discussions on this topic as an example of an educational scientific debate, and puts it into perspective based on the results of the Concawe project.

AB - The health effects of benzene have been a major concern for regulators and health experts for many years. This has led to significantly lower regulatory threshold limits (such as occupational exposure limits, OELs) and the implementation of corresponding risk management measures to reduce benzene concentrations and human exposure to benzene in the production, transport and use of petroleum products such as gasolines. Over the past decade, a series of research papers has been published by a group of researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, who postulated effects of benzene at very low dose exposures—levels which are relevant to current operations in the oil and gas industry and are currently (well) below the occupational exposure limits in most jurisdictions. A strong public scientific debate followed the publication of these papers, and in response to this, Concawe concluded a research project this year with two independent consultants who reanalysed the dataset to shed new light on this ongoing debate.This Concawe Review article provides the reader with a short overview of the scientific argumentation in the ongoing discussions on this topic as an example of an educational scientific debate, and puts it into perspective based on the results of the Concawe project.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cbi.2017.06.023

DO - 10.1016/j.cbi.2017.06.023

M3 - Article

VL - 278

SP - 239

EP - 241

JO - Chemico-Biological Interactions

JF - Chemico-Biological Interactions

SN - 0009-2797

ER -