The limits of regulatory convergence: globalization and GMO politics in the south

R. Falkner, A. Gupta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Is globalization promoting regulatory convergence in agricultural biotechnology policies in the South? This article examines the nature and limits of regulatory convergence in the field of agri-biotechnology and investigates the effects that international forces have on biotechnology and biosafety policies in developing countries. Based on detailed case studies of Mexico, China and South Africa this article shows that these three leading biotechnology countries in the South are exposed to powerful international influences but are responding to the regulatory challenges of genetically modified organisms (GMO) adoption in distinctive ways. The existing regulatory polarization between US and EU biotechnology approaches has not forced a convergence around either of these two international models. GMO policies in the South do not simply follow the binary logic of the US¿EU regulatory conflict. Instead, they integrate elements from both regulatory approaches and are steering a course that suggests substantial regulatory diversity in the South. The globalization of biotechnology thus goes hand in hand with regulatory diversity in the developing world. Furthermore, regulatory polarization between the EU and US has helped to open up political space in key developing countries
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-133
JournalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

biotechnology
globalization
politics
polarization
EU
developing country
biotechnology policy
logic
Mexico
Globalization
Genetically modified organisms
China
Biotechnology

Keywords

  • genetically-modified food
  • policy convergence
  • harmonization
  • governance
  • mexico
  • china
  • eu
  • us

Cite this

@article{b061d19316a24a27a7e246d8bcd1d8c7,
title = "The limits of regulatory convergence: globalization and GMO politics in the south",
abstract = "Is globalization promoting regulatory convergence in agricultural biotechnology policies in the South? This article examines the nature and limits of regulatory convergence in the field of agri-biotechnology and investigates the effects that international forces have on biotechnology and biosafety policies in developing countries. Based on detailed case studies of Mexico, China and South Africa this article shows that these three leading biotechnology countries in the South are exposed to powerful international influences but are responding to the regulatory challenges of genetically modified organisms (GMO) adoption in distinctive ways. The existing regulatory polarization between US and EU biotechnology approaches has not forced a convergence around either of these two international models. GMO policies in the South do not simply follow the binary logic of the US¿EU regulatory conflict. Instead, they integrate elements from both regulatory approaches and are steering a course that suggests substantial regulatory diversity in the South. The globalization of biotechnology thus goes hand in hand with regulatory diversity in the developing world. Furthermore, regulatory polarization between the EU and US has helped to open up political space in key developing countries",
keywords = "genetically-modified food, policy convergence, harmonization, governance, mexico, china, eu, us",
author = "R. Falkner and A. Gupta",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/s10784-009-9094-x",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "113--133",
journal = "International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics",
issn = "1567-9764",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

The limits of regulatory convergence: globalization and GMO politics in the south. / Falkner, R.; Gupta, A.

In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2009, p. 113-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The limits of regulatory convergence: globalization and GMO politics in the south

AU - Falkner, R.

AU - Gupta, A.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Is globalization promoting regulatory convergence in agricultural biotechnology policies in the South? This article examines the nature and limits of regulatory convergence in the field of agri-biotechnology and investigates the effects that international forces have on biotechnology and biosafety policies in developing countries. Based on detailed case studies of Mexico, China and South Africa this article shows that these three leading biotechnology countries in the South are exposed to powerful international influences but are responding to the regulatory challenges of genetically modified organisms (GMO) adoption in distinctive ways. The existing regulatory polarization between US and EU biotechnology approaches has not forced a convergence around either of these two international models. GMO policies in the South do not simply follow the binary logic of the US¿EU regulatory conflict. Instead, they integrate elements from both regulatory approaches and are steering a course that suggests substantial regulatory diversity in the South. The globalization of biotechnology thus goes hand in hand with regulatory diversity in the developing world. Furthermore, regulatory polarization between the EU and US has helped to open up political space in key developing countries

AB - Is globalization promoting regulatory convergence in agricultural biotechnology policies in the South? This article examines the nature and limits of regulatory convergence in the field of agri-biotechnology and investigates the effects that international forces have on biotechnology and biosafety policies in developing countries. Based on detailed case studies of Mexico, China and South Africa this article shows that these three leading biotechnology countries in the South are exposed to powerful international influences but are responding to the regulatory challenges of genetically modified organisms (GMO) adoption in distinctive ways. The existing regulatory polarization between US and EU biotechnology approaches has not forced a convergence around either of these two international models. GMO policies in the South do not simply follow the binary logic of the US¿EU regulatory conflict. Instead, they integrate elements from both regulatory approaches and are steering a course that suggests substantial regulatory diversity in the South. The globalization of biotechnology thus goes hand in hand with regulatory diversity in the developing world. Furthermore, regulatory polarization between the EU and US has helped to open up political space in key developing countries

KW - genetically-modified food

KW - policy convergence

KW - harmonization

KW - governance

KW - mexico

KW - china

KW - eu

KW - us

U2 - 10.1007/s10784-009-9094-x

DO - 10.1007/s10784-009-9094-x

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 113

EP - 133

JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

SN - 1567-9764

IS - 2

ER -