The Legitimacy of Certification Standards in Climate Change Governance

C. de la Plaza Esteban, I.J. Visseren-Hamakers, W. de Jong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the role of two private steering mechanisms, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance (CCBA), in REDD+, the climate change mitigation policy that aims to avoid deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. It does so by analyzing input and output legitimacy of the two certification standards at the global level, and at national and local levels in Peru. The findings show an increasing interest among REDD+ actors in using these standards, and a relatively large number of Peruvian REDD+ projects that are certified by the FSC or CCBA. The findings also suggest intrinsic linkages between input and output legitimacy of the FSC and CCBA within single governance levels and across different scales. The article also demonstrates the added value of studying the legitimacy of policy instruments, such as the FSC and CCBA, in a specific context such as REDD+. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)420-432
JournalSustainable Development
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
certification
Climate change
legitimacy
climate change
biodiversity
governance
climate
community
Deforestation
Enterprise resource planning
Developing countries
Peru
value added
deforestation
Degradation
developing world
developing country

Keywords

  • global environmental governance
  • sustainable development
  • institutional design
  • forest governance
  • co-benefits
  • carbon
  • market
  • redd+
  • state
  • accountability

Cite this

de la Plaza Esteban, C., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., & de Jong, W. (2014). The Legitimacy of Certification Standards in Climate Change Governance. Sustainable Development, 22(6), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1568
de la Plaza Esteban, C. ; Visseren-Hamakers, I.J. ; de Jong, W. / The Legitimacy of Certification Standards in Climate Change Governance. In: Sustainable Development. 2014 ; Vol. 22, No. 6. pp. 420-432.
@article{8825eb60ece84f2d841b62937ae68efa,
title = "The Legitimacy of Certification Standards in Climate Change Governance",
abstract = "This article explores the role of two private steering mechanisms, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance (CCBA), in REDD+, the climate change mitigation policy that aims to avoid deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. It does so by analyzing input and output legitimacy of the two certification standards at the global level, and at national and local levels in Peru. The findings show an increasing interest among REDD+ actors in using these standards, and a relatively large number of Peruvian REDD+ projects that are certified by the FSC or CCBA. The findings also suggest intrinsic linkages between input and output legitimacy of the FSC and CCBA within single governance levels and across different scales. The article also demonstrates the added value of studying the legitimacy of policy instruments, such as the FSC and CCBA, in a specific context such as REDD+. Copyright {\circledC} 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.",
keywords = "global environmental governance, sustainable development, institutional design, forest governance, co-benefits, carbon, market, redd+, state, accountability",
author = "{de la Plaza Esteban}, C. and I.J. Visseren-Hamakers and {de Jong}, W.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/sd.1568",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "420--432",
journal = "Sustainable Development",
issn = "0968-0802",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "6",

}

de la Plaza Esteban, C, Visseren-Hamakers, IJ & de Jong, W 2014, 'The Legitimacy of Certification Standards in Climate Change Governance', Sustainable Development, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1568

The Legitimacy of Certification Standards in Climate Change Governance. / de la Plaza Esteban, C.; Visseren-Hamakers, I.J.; de Jong, W.

In: Sustainable Development, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2014, p. 420-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Legitimacy of Certification Standards in Climate Change Governance

AU - de la Plaza Esteban, C.

AU - Visseren-Hamakers, I.J.

AU - de Jong, W.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article explores the role of two private steering mechanisms, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance (CCBA), in REDD+, the climate change mitigation policy that aims to avoid deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. It does so by analyzing input and output legitimacy of the two certification standards at the global level, and at national and local levels in Peru. The findings show an increasing interest among REDD+ actors in using these standards, and a relatively large number of Peruvian REDD+ projects that are certified by the FSC or CCBA. The findings also suggest intrinsic linkages between input and output legitimacy of the FSC and CCBA within single governance levels and across different scales. The article also demonstrates the added value of studying the legitimacy of policy instruments, such as the FSC and CCBA, in a specific context such as REDD+. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

AB - This article explores the role of two private steering mechanisms, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance (CCBA), in REDD+, the climate change mitigation policy that aims to avoid deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. It does so by analyzing input and output legitimacy of the two certification standards at the global level, and at national and local levels in Peru. The findings show an increasing interest among REDD+ actors in using these standards, and a relatively large number of Peruvian REDD+ projects that are certified by the FSC or CCBA. The findings also suggest intrinsic linkages between input and output legitimacy of the FSC and CCBA within single governance levels and across different scales. The article also demonstrates the added value of studying the legitimacy of policy instruments, such as the FSC and CCBA, in a specific context such as REDD+. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

KW - global environmental governance

KW - sustainable development

KW - institutional design

KW - forest governance

KW - co-benefits

KW - carbon

KW - market

KW - redd+

KW - state

KW - accountability

U2 - 10.1002/sd.1568

DO - 10.1002/sd.1568

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 420

EP - 432

JO - Sustainable Development

JF - Sustainable Development

SN - 0968-0802

IS - 6

ER -